Talk:Mitsubishi G4M

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Military aviation task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	Japanese military history task force
Associated task forces (periods and conflicts):
	World War II task force

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Aviation Portal

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated projects or task forces:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

Aircraft WikiProject

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Japan To-do:

[edit] Heavy bomber ?

According to the description in Operational History, Betty is comparable to Mitchelle and Marauder. Then it should only be a medium bomber and can not be a heavy bomber as stated in the "Airplane Information" table. Bomb load of only 800 kg (in Specification) is also small. Dieu2005 15:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. Done. Binksternet 20:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

On the other hand, due to its long range G4M had definite strategic capability even if its bomb load was rather small. So the question is, what really makes the difference between medium and heavy bombers?

I'd personally suggest G4M to be classified as an attack bomber because it's the term I've seen most commonly connected with the type.

Läyhä 12:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The most distacated?

Any guesses as to what this means? I value the additions by non-native English speakers, but sometimes it's a real stretch trying to figure out what was intended. Binksternet (talk) 00:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Mitsubishi G4M

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Heavy bomber ?

[edit] The most distacated?

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search