Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Importers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep and redirect.

Note from the author: This is a very short article and I think it works better as a redirect to Wikipedia:User access levels. Although this wasn't the consensus, it fits with the intent of most of the comments. I don't think there will be opposition to this decision, but if you disagree, let me know on my talk page. Isaac (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Not entirely sure what this is intended for, though there is an explanation in the page. The explanation seems unworkable to me, however, since it claims it's a category when it clearly isn't. As such, it seems purposeless and deleteable. Grutness...wha? 01:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as useless. Description isn't even correct. While +sysop does have rights to see Special:Import, we are greeted by a message informing us that it's been disabled. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 04:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

If its inaccurate, I'm sorry, I just wanted to put something there. But MfD is based on an article's topic, not the articles status of a single inaccurate sentence. Isaac (talk) 02:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

• Comment created a day or so ago, so did anyone bother asking the author what their intention was? -- Ned Scott 05:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for now; recreate if it becomes relevant later. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up. It's a "user right" flag. Monobi (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep I authored this stub because I noticed a userrights flag mentioned without associated help. If its an unused flag, I think we should just have a stub saying its currently unused. As a flag that's mentioned on the Special:Import page, I think it deserves a short article about its status and current use (or disuse). There's not much to say about the flag, but I think it deserves a brief paragraph. But I have no strong attachment to it: if it goes, it goes. Isaac (talk) 02:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite to adapt to current situation, per creator's comment above (Isaac). This can be solved throught normal editing --Enric Naval (talk) 02:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. I've wanted to know what imports were (on Wikipedia) since I've noticed the category on Special:Listusers or Special:Userrights or something like that. However, if it's unused, I don't see how it can be expanded much. A redirect from Wikipedia:Imports would also be useful. ~AH1^(TCU) 02:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• OK - makes a bit more sense now. No objection to it staying if it's edited to explain itself a little more clearly. Grutness...wha? 02:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Probably a good idea to either delete or expand and move to Meta..might be more useful there..--Cometstyles 09:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.