Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Videobabylon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete unanimously. 16:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Videobabylon

Delete. Page is nothing but an advert for a photgraphy company. Only other user contributions have been to spam various articles. User has been warned twice about this, yet continues. ... discospinster _talk 13:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, Wikipedia is not a free advertising vehicle or web host. Kimchi.sg 13:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. BD2412 T 14:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Discospinster's right. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 17:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and let user start it over if he wishes. Also per WP:SPAM. --Slgrandson 17:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Liberatore(T) 18:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per kimchi.sg -- Where 04:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. And a poorly done ad at that, in my opinion. Grandmasterka 02:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with extreme prejudice. "Wedding bells will be ringing soon"? Terrible advert. Oh yeah - WP:NOT, which is actually relevant. Sorry, I was distracted by the bad copy. KillerChihuahua^?!? 12:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.