Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tamr007

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:09, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Tamr007

Tamr007 continues making copies of my user page in his, despite my several requests he stop, both in edit summaries and on his talk page. I removed the copied material myself, but he continues reverting. He has currently hidden the content using comment tags, but when I again attempted to remove the copied content, he continues to revert it and blank the messages asking him to stop from his talk page. Asking for straight page deletion to remove the inappropriate copying of the entire page from the history all together. He seems to just be restoring to be annoying. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamr007 (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia:Ownership of articles —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamr007 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

You're copying like this is a completely misrepresentation of who you are, and gives the false impression that you are me. Your blind copying also falsely takes credit for work I did which you had no part in. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. It is hard to think of any good faith reasons for Tamr007 to do this. The copying does not violate any licenses, but it seems peculiar. EdJohnston (talk) 04:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: I fail to see how this is made in good faith. And actions by the account seem to be bordering on trolling. seicer | talk | contribs 05:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't violate the GFDL but is also completely unhelpful. Stifle (talk) 11:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, not as a copyvio (it is attributed, so it is not), but as an apparent attempt at trolling. It is true that there is no legal restriction against copying Collectonian's userpage, but we certainly do frown on harassment and deliberately annoying others. Should Tamr007 wish to use Collectonian's userpage design as a starting point for his/her own, that is not problematic, but a straight copy could be confusing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete go be annoying somewhere else buddy. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 11:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete this is too WP:POINTy, after deletion, I suggest Tamr007 to make a new user page that is not a direct copy/paste of another user, and go back to improving TV articles --Enric Naval (talk) 21:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I watched this unfold from the noticeboard and went to the user's page and found it to be harassment. It looked like the user was also the administrator who the page was copied and pasted from. I am making this comment from an outside view as I do not know either of these editors. Thank you, --CrohnieGal^Talk 17:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

FRom Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

He is allowed to blank messages. Also per rules. He is allowed to copy our userpage as long as he does not claim to be you. He is in the right as I do not see him claiming to be you. Rgoodermote 03:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I've had people copy my user page and have edited it somewhat but I don't have an issue as long its not a page trying to make it look as if it's my account. It maybe wrong for them to copy your user page but I don't think there is a policy on Wikipedia which states you can't copy other editors pages (I could be wrong and happy to be wrong). Bidgee (talk) 03:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Not to sound rude, but who cares? I mean it is just a userpage. We are ultimately here to create a encyclopedia (I am starting to sound like a broken record) not another myspace, if he wants to use your userpage, no big deal, granted that he replaces your username with his. I say move on. Also, may I note WP:OWN. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 03:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I went ahead an placed a notice on the user in question userpage. Tiptoety talk 04:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Harassment? This does not appear to be anything but a new user who wants a userpage and saw one he likes from someone whom he likes (per his userpage). I mean has WP:BITE gone though anyones mind here, I mean it appears to be a good faith account. Tiptoety talk 04:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Tamr007 (talk) 07:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Very nice selective copy/pasting. For anyone wishing to read the whole discussion Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive423#User:Tamr007 copying user page which specifically ended with the note that it should be discussed here, as it is being. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 08:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. This is a good faith request. It should be honored. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. User:Tamr007 is, no doubt in good faith, being extremely discourteous to a user who, for whatever reason, is upset. WP:CIVIL surely applies. MikeHobday (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I fail to see how deleting the page in question would be much different from reverting, as Tamr007 can simply recreate the page. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 01:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

• If this MfD concludes that the page is inappropriate, this editor would be unwise to recreate it. Though there is not yet any hint that it would be necessary, admin tools could be used to prevent that. EdJohnston (talk) 05:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.