Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kyle E. Coyote

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:Kyle E. Coyote

This user page is like a MySpace profile. Tried to discuss on talk page, but the user keeps blanking the page. The vast majority of this user's contribs are to this page, almost an single purpose account that exists for no reason other than this "profile" page. Beeblbrox (talk) 19:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace or social networking site. Ironholds 19:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

• Blank inappropriate content, warn user, and consider blocking. This user knows he is abusing our rules. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, the page contains several personal attacks on celebrities and groups of people. This kind of material in userspace may be deleted on sight. This is explicit at Wikipedia:BLP#Non-article_space. Blanking a page doesn't remove, should I say like in the policy, "delete" the content (it can be reverted, copied, etc) and we're not restricted like in mainspace. Concerning the user, he has been warned repeatedly, let's see how things evolve and hope that he'll contribute constructively. Cenarium (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep myspace-ish material already removed, question moot. Chimeric Glider (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

• What makes you say it won't be reinstated ? And we're not just talking about myspace-ish material but also personal attacks. Cenarium (talk) 23:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

• And now, an anonymous IP who has edited this page, and seems to share many of the same interests as Kyle has vandalized my user page. I'm sure it's just a coincidence right? Beeblbrox (talk) 04:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

• There is no such thing as coincidence, only inevitability. I think his editing of KEC's userpage is also a hint it's him. Ironholds 04:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

• Just got done reporting this new development here. Anyone who has more diffs to add, please do so. Beeblbrox (talk) 04:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

• Note that deletion of "inappropriate content" makes it more difficult to identify socks. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

• Then the page is just deleted and recreated with a SSP notice, or placed on the talk page, the present sockpuppetry is obvious anyway. Cenarium (talk) 12:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)