Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:RAW (rolling paper)/Archive1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep; there is no valid reason given to delete the discussion archive. — TKD::Talk 08:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:RAW (rolling paper)/Archive1

containes profanity and attacks by a user who admits he works for a competitor of the item being discussed

Please edit the page to Wiki standards OR delete it (your choice guys..)--Put that in your pipe and smoke it 20:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy keep Nothing on there seems inappropriate and definitely nothing seems worthy of deleting the archive totally. Metros 20:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
  • the problem is if I try to remove the profanity and attacks the attacker goes ballistic and puts them all back up (just watch..) --Put that in your pipe and smoke it 20:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Well that would be because you have no reason to be editing other people's comments. As I told you, Wikipedia is not censored. Profanity is allowed (though editors are reminded to be civil in their comments to each other. Metros 20:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
      • I have no problem with you removing your attacks, as I have already told you [1], I just don't see why you removed the other discussions on that page [2] Onyx86 20:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep - Nomination seems to be made in bad faith.--WaltCip 21:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

now that I nominated it, the attacker is allowing the necessary changes to happen. If that remains it won't need to be deleted. However when the discussion is closed he might attack again :( --Put that in your pipe and smoke it 21:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep. It's just an archive of past comments. Plenty of pages have them, some even with profanity. It's no big deal. There are no "wikistandards" against profanity. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 23:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Actually, we are not censored. We do have policies on pronifty, but it is by no means prohibited. And telling someone not to cuss on a talk page is like the optometrist telling you not to blink. Unless it is a personal attack, just take a deep breath and remind the offender to remain civil and man up.--12 Noon 02:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep Not only a questionable nomination (i.e. nominating a page the nominator has editwarred over) but also Archives are meant as... Archives. Editing to remove alleged attacks is a bad idea. CharonX/talk 02:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep we don't delete archives like that. Hut 8.5 10:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.