Talk:Military history of the Three Kingdoms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Detail from the Battle of Changban  Military history of the Three Kingdoms is within the scope of WikiProject Three Kingdoms, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles related to historical or fictionalized characters and events of the Three Kingdoms period of Chinese history. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
This article has been marked as needing attention.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-Importance on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] editted crossbow section

The cho-ko-nu was a semi-automatic anti personel crossbow weapon. Also, I deleted "The military warfare of that time was more involved in melee and cavalry tactics. The secondary reason that archers were never massly deployed was to avoid friendly fire when enemies close in. Range killing was also considered a less and sometimes unchivalrous way of disposing enemies." because I have found numerous sources that said that Chinese armies placed emphasis on missle weapons. The part about "range killing being unchivalrous" applies more to European attitudes towards the crossbow during the medieval ages.

-intranetusa

[edit] More Appropriate Name

Shouldn't this be named something else? I can't think of a better title at the moment (It's quite late right now), but I don't think history fits with the spirit of this article. 66.176.244.196 06:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)