Talk:Melbourne Grammar School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.	Schools Portal
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within Schools. Please rate the article.

Portal	Melbourne Grammar School is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

well done to whomever massively expanded the alumni list Viva43 07:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. It's really simply - albeit time consuming. I just scan the "What links here" list for names, and check whether it states that a person is a graduate. This strategy can be widely employed for similar lists on Wikipedia. Harro5 09:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Details of debating teams 2 MGS Leadership Program 3 WikiProject class rating 4 ENTER 5 Deakin in Wadhurst

[edit] Details of debating teams

I believe that the details of recent debating results, including the names of student debaters, is not notable enough for inclusion. Any thoughts? Cnwb 06:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I noticed on the Scotch College page, there were recent results (notable results, I felt) and I also felt more detail could not harm the curious. I don't see the problem in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raags (talk • contribs)

Whilst the Scotch College article does mention debating competitions, it does not go into unnecessary detail of individual participants (none of whom are notable in their own right). I think this level of detail detracts from the conciseness of the article. Cnwb 07:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MGS Leadership Program

It appears that the content regarding the school's leadership program lacks dephth; this is somewhat suprising, given that the school is willing is spend in excess of 10 million dollars on a CLL. Perhaps some editing of that section would be useful. Compared to the wiki page of Scotch College (Melbourne), the actual amount of detail in some sections is somewhat bare. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.254.184 (talk) 09:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ENTER

For many Victorian schools, I've noticed the repeated reference to "ENTER Rank" in their pages. However, ENTER stands for "Equivalent National Tertiary Entrance Rank", so the use of the word "rank" should be completely removed, as it is redundant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.180.117 (talk) 11:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deakin in Wadhurst

There used to be a Deakin in Wadhurst when I attended. Should this be mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.25.8.1 (talk) 01:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)