User talk:Measl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Measl,

I am amazed that not one of the obsessive-compulsive well-meaning Wikipedians gave you a welcome message, so I thought I'd welcome you myself.

Thanks for your input on the Twinkie Defense article. It's good to have more opinions (especially when they so neatly dovetail with my own).

And I love your userpage! Very provoking, in every sense of the word.

If you ever need any help here, drop me a line.

Jeffpw 12:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC) (who is still waking up after a long, stressful evening shift)

[edit] Twinkie defense Request for comments

Thanks very much for responding to the Request for comments. As your did seem to be clearly related to the RfC, I've moved the comment (completely intact) to an appropriate location within the RfC, with cross-referencing between the two locations so its apparent what I've done. Hope that is okay, as you had expressed uncertainty about where exactly it should go. Best wishes, & welcome to Wikipedia. --Yksin 16:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

I read your commets on kbh3rd - just so you know I support your stance.  Don't mind kbh3rd too much.  He's just a pissant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.39.106 (talk) 22:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 

[edit] Paroxetine isn't rubbish.

I was surprised to see the statement you made in the beginning of the paroxetine page. i checked the study, it clearly states: "In conclusion, we found that paroxetine was not superior to placebo in terms of the proportion of study participants discontinuing treatment for any reason; in terms of depression measures, paroxetine exerted a modest antidepressant effect relative to placebo." perhaps its different because i read the study online (at cmaj.ca) I apologize if I sound offensive in criticizing you. I didn't intend to. Fdskjs (talk) 00:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)