User talk:Fdskjs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Monoamine oxidase and cigarette smoke

Sorry I posted this originally on your user page, I've not been editing wikipedia in ages.

Check out these links: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=17382522&ordinalpos=6&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=9549600&ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus http://www.behaviouralpharm.com/pt/re/bpharm/abstract.00008877-200711000-00003.htm

ElBenevolente(talk)

[edit] Rorschach

Please don't make edits based solely on the title of a source. You added inaccurate information. If you hadn't explained what you did on the talk page, I would have given you a warning template about adding false information. The sentence in the article accurately refers to psychosis. Just because the title uses the word "psychopathy" does not mean the article doesn't discuss psychosis. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: psychopathy is not psychosis

The article mentions, "It has been employed in diagnosing underlying thought disorder and differentiating psychotic from nonpsychotic thinking in cases where the patient is reluctant to openly admit to psychotic thinking.[1]",
except [1] is "Rorschach Assessment of Aggressive and Psychopathic Personalities". Psychopathy is a personality thing, and has nothing to do with psychosis! one does not have to admit thought disorder for it to be noticeable (its defined by usage of speech).
 One additional thing is that thought disorder has nothing to do with psychopathy as well. I will remove that bit. I hope that by changing "psychotic" into "psychopathic" I am doing the right thing. I don't have the book. Fdskjs (talk) 06:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I reverted. The source discusses psychosis. Ward3001 (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Even Psychosis mentions that psychosis is very different from psychopathy. I don't know what to do about this, but I think the source is wrong in using the term psychotic - especially when the title actually uses the word psychopathic. Fdskjs (talk) 20:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Did you understand my edit above? Have you looked at anything in the source besides the title? The article discusses both psychosis and psychopathy. The statement "It has been employed in diagnosing underlying thought disorder and differentiating psychotic from nonpsychotic thinking in cases where the patient is reluctant to openly admit to psychotic thinking" is not an inaccurate reflection of what the source says, and the source's title is not inaccurate. Please. Don't edit a statement solely on the title of a source without looking at the source. Nothing needs to be done about it. Ward3001 (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)