Talk:Marcel-Paul Schützenberger
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please note that to fully evaluate this biography, a strong working knowledge of academic-style French is strongly suggested. -- QTJ 21:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Praising as "bete noire"?
I'm confused nonetheless praising it as one of his "bête-noires" alongside his thinking on artificial intelligence; how can something be "praised" as a bête-noire??? The source doesn't quite use this kind of wording. I'm not French enough to know if this is correct usage, but it seems strange to me. Merzul (talk) 18:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Has there been any response to his mathematical attacks on evolution?
Surely people have by now done some mathematical modelling of these matters. I'm not suggesting that he needs to be completely refuted on his biography, but his criticism must have lead to some rigorous models being developed and in the end the theory of evolution still stands to this day, so clearly people must have done the math and responded to his work. This should be mentioned, I think. Merzul (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

