User talk:Luvcraft
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] list of beat 'em ups
I have moved the content to User:Luvcraft/list of beat 'em ups. --Ezeu 21:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- thanks! Luvcraft 22:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] August 2007
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Tiddly Tom 17:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, it is better if you archive your talk page, insted of just deleting messages issued to you by other editors. Thanks. Tiddly Tom 17:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- What the heck are you talking about, and why are you doing it on my usertalk page? Luvcraft 17:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your RfA
Hi there. I'm really sorry but I had to close your RfA per WP:SNOW as it was rapidly heading into failure. May I suggest you get a few more months editing behind you then possibly apply again when, hopefully, things will be a lot different? Really sorry - Alison ☺ 00:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Per Alison! Politics rule 00:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry to see your RfA failed. :( (I would have voted but most of it was happening while I was offline.) I wish you better luck next time. — $PЯINGεrαgђ 04:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- That's OK, honestly I was more interested to see what kind of feedback it would get than I was in gaining any of the powers of an admin. I was expecting it to be a little less unanimously negative, though. :( Oh well, this is what happens when staunch exopedians try to dabble in the Wikipedia metagame. :) Luvcraft 13:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Luvcraft, if your main concern was getting feedback, you might look into WP:Editor review or Wikipedia:Admin coaching if you haven't already. You're likely to get more useful feedback. A near-unanimous "no" on an RfA is not the same as a near-unanimous "we think you're doing a terrible job". --barneca (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't know such things existed! Thanks! Luvcraft 01:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Luvcraft, if your main concern was getting feedback, you might look into WP:Editor review or Wikipedia:Admin coaching if you haven't already. You're likely to get more useful feedback. A near-unanimous "no" on an RfA is not the same as a near-unanimous "we think you're doing a terrible job". --barneca (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Great Dark Horde notability tag
I gather you are not in the SCA? --Orange Mike 16:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Nope! Please expand the article with information on why the Great Dark Horde is notable outside of the SCA. Thanks! Luvcraft 20:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
