Talk:Lupu Bridge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Controversy
The text is almost identical to the Hangzhou Bay Bridge, cites no sourses and seems quite political and biased. --Bollweevil 11:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- The controversy section is obviously totally inadequate. Just look at the wording, using weasel words like "HEAVILY criticised" or "by the public and scholars alike". A personal and unfounded statement - I suggest removal, as there are no sources on the web supporting such a claim. Tang Wenlong (talk) 01:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Agreed. Unless the section's author comes with more concrete data on "controversy", this section should be removed. As for the very existence of controversy, of course the project provoked controversy: which large public project didn't? This is not an information per se. --bonzi (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

