Talk:Low-g condition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify its strengths and weaknesses.

Maintained The following user(s) are actively involved with this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources:
Pilotguy (talk contribs  email)
This in no way implies article ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute.
AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Please explain below why this article contradicts itself - this assertation is not clear--ChrisJMoor 02:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

The final section asserts that Low-G flight conditions make fixed-wing aircraft difficult or impossible to control. The subsequent paragraph says that Low-G conditions increase their controllability. --Mgechert 07:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

I assume it means it is harder to make the plane do what you want, yet with enough skill you can make the plane do more - i.e. more extreme acrobatics than is possible in normal flight. The use of the word "control" in both sentences is a bit confusing, however.

I can't find the place where it says that it is easier to control an aircraft in 0g. Howerver, that is a lie. 0g has no larger effect on modern aircraft, since the aerodynamic flow over the wings are still moving, hence the controlability of the aircraft remains. There was a problem with some aircraft used during WW2 that seemed to stop in mid-air and fall up to severel hundred feet. This was due to the 0g that made the plane tilt forward after the inverted parapolic turn, and since it did this, the airplane was pointing downwards.