Wikipedia talk:Long term abuse/JB196

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wikipedia:Long term abuse/JB196 page.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming

[edit] Instructions

In the infobox, the instructions say: "Revert, speedy new AfD's and block on sight." Could some clarification be given here, "speedy new AfDs"? Does this mean speedy close as keep? Speedy delete the entire AfD nom? I'm assuming probably speedy close as a bad faith nomination, but what if the article indeed, qualifies as a deletion due to notability? Maybe I'm being picky, but I've recently become aware of this highly disruptive editor, and I'd like a little clarification as to the actions. Thanks! Ariel♥Gold 21:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

That should mean speedy delete the AfD itself per G5 - work of banned user. Remember to delist it from the log and remove the AfD banner from the article as well. Resurgent insurgent (as admin) 14:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Another one?

I don't have time to follow up on this at the moment, but User:WillOakland is removing trivia sections much like User:Burntsauce used to. Katr67 (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I must concur. This user has been outright deleting many trivia sections instead of incorporating them into the article. ----Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 06:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:ReverseStabber

I believe User:ReverseStabber to be a sock of User:JB196. What can be done about this? Qaddosh|_contribs^talk 01:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)