Talk:Lockheed NF-104A

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Aircraft WikiProject

A fact from Lockheed NF-104A appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 1 November 2007.

[edit] Welcome to the Lockheed NF-104A talk page

It is intended that this article be edited using American English grammar and spellings (even though I am English!!) as per WP:MOS and WP:AIR.

The article needs a three view drawing of the type if anyone has a 'free' one. many thanks Nimbus227 19:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

It's a hand-drawn one, but you are welcome to it. BTW, great job on the story of an interesting sub-type. Sorry we were both editing on top of each other, read the article to make sure I didn't accidentally eliminate something. FWIW Bzuk 19:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC).

Ooops! A bit of a blooper with mixing up the individual histories, must have gone cross eyed.

Thanks, will wait a bit till everyone else has had a chance to correct things. I did think this type was worth an article of its own. The fourth airframe info is interesting, I did have something on that but chose not to put it in but it is better with it, hope editing this is taking your mind off of other matters. Cheers Nimbus227 19:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, unfortunately, the latest "flap" has sapped all my energy but I will look up the sketch I made when I was trying to convert a plastic model to an NF-104 standard. FWIW Bzuk 20:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC).

There are quite a few drawings about in books and on the web, NF-104.com does not seem to have a copyright statement page unless I missed it, nice to see so many people getting the article up to scratchNimbus227 20:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the three view, quite a good one, cheers Nimbus227 16:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)