Talk:Lockheed MC-130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

I've decided to boldly move the content from MC-130H Combat Talon II into this article. After wikifying and significntly expanding the article, I learned that this is a series of three aircraft and is better suited for a single article dealing with all three variants. Should work out fine here. The old article is now a redirect. Consequentially 02:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Added MC-130W

I added a section on the MC-130W. While this hasn't officially become the Talon III, it certainly deserves a place. Given it's mission, associated airframes, its location, and its overall capabilities, the MC-130W belongs here http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=4887 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.17.129.22 (talk) 19:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Citation for Cambodia claim?

The article reads "Later that year, MC-130H missions carried commando units into Cambodia.[1]". However the text at the provided link makes no mention of US operations in Cambodia. I don't recall any US military action in Cambodia in the 90s nor do I see mention of one on a cursory glace through the Cambodian history articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.199.251 (talk) 08:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I put a {{fact}} tag on it instead of the given reference. If it doesn't change in a few weeks, we should just delete the claim (but let's give people a chance to fix it if they have some information. — BQZip01 — talk 14:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)