Talk:Lockerbie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.
WikiProject Scotland
Lockerbie is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


I was on PanAm Flight 103 exactly 7 days after the plane was blown up over Lockerbie. I am currently doing some research for a mystery novel that employs my experiences (an eeriely empy Gatwick Airport for starters). If there is anyone that has experiences from that tragedy that they wish to share, please contact me at gnrlapathy@aol.com.

[edit] Population

It was changed from 10,000 to 4,500 by an IP address that a few days later made a minor vandalism. Which is correct?

4,009 according to the 2001 census. will change.

Exile 20:57, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] PANAM 103 LOCKERBIE

With regards to PANAM 103 I was the fifth Intelligence Officer scheduled to fly on the plane. At the time of the incident I was the Chief of Intelligence Production for the United States 1st Armored Division, Ansbach Germany. As to why I changed my flight I will leave that to other discussion areas. Edward A. Chesky Jr., former Major United States Army, Military Intelligence Corps.

[edit] Alleged silly edits

What is silly about [194.57.157.28 these] edits. Linking Americans, asking for a fact tag and pointing out what kind of incident it was dont sound silly to me, sounds like normal editing. Please expalain yourself here, SqueakBox 21:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Your edits add nothing to the article, but rather detract from it. Why not just leave well alone?Phase4 22:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Huh? How do they do that? And what do you mean, leave well alone, we are here to make for a betetr encyclopedia and that is what i am doing. You really need to explain yourself better, this is a subject of obvious importance to many British and other people and all i am doing is making simple, non-controversial changes. I really do not understand your objections, SqueakBox 22:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
You're one to talk SqueakBox. I'm still waiting to hear your explanations for reverting my edits for no good reason. Ospinad 17:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)