Talk:Liverpool Blue Coat School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within Schools. Please rate the article. | |
Contents |
[edit] The Prefect System
To whom it may concern, I have no relationship at all with this school and am patrolling it for vandalism (which occurs quite a lot.) The Prefect System paragraph has been removed at least twice with no explanation. If someone feels that this is because it is irrelevant or not factual please discuss it here. Thanks.Mmoneypenny 08:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] hmm
"The school is famous for its dinner time 'Scripture Union' whereby religious figureheads may visit the school. The Scripture Union is an esteemed club led by Mr. Singer and once featured the stories of Bill Maynard, Mr Claude Greengrass himself."
Is it REALLY famous for its Scripture Union ? Also - 'religious figureheads' ?
- An ex-pupil
[edit] NPOV?
It appears that the church of england's plan to subsume, and destroy, this fine old school has succeeded, as according to a teacher speaking to a class, containing my son, this afternoon (June 25th 2007), the Headmaster, Sandy Tittershill, has, in an unprecedented manner and with almost no notice, resigned with effect from the end of the current school year.
This newly added paragraph hardly counts as neutral point of view - what evidence is there that the Church of England has a plan to subsume or destroy the school? The Diocese of Liverpool believes that the school's status (from its foundation) is that of a Church of England school and that it should have been so designated. See discussion below. Stratocastermagic 13:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Stratocastermagic
[edit] Tricentinary Appeal
"At the start of the Autumn term the total stands at £416,886, a remarkable sum after only a year of fundraising."
Can it really be said to be remarkable? The school plans to make 1 million in two years so isn't actually on target thus far. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.121.149 (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The East Wing
"The fine facilities <snip> are all available for hire, including weddings and services as of July 2006. Further details can be found on the School's website - please see the link below."
Shouldn't this blatant commercial be removed from the article? At the very least is seems the tackiest line in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.162.129.1 (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
