Talk:List of characters from Sonic X

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of characters from Sonic X article.

Article policies

This article is within the scope of the The Sega Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sega products. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

List This article has been rated as list-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within The Sega Project
This article is supported by the Sonic task force.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:DecoeBocoe.jpg

Image:DecoeBocoe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scarlet Garcia

Shouldn't there be a section on Scarlet Garcia.Fairfieldfencer (talk) 18:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Fairfieldfencer

[edit] Cosmo's link

why does cosmos link now redirect to this page? that makes no sense —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.119.244 (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Because the Cosmo page has been deleted.Fairfieldfencer (talk) 22:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Fairfieldfencer

Yes, and I am the culprit responsible. Gotta follow the rules man. Peace! X3. 23:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

that makes sense. next time inform us. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.119.244 (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I proposed it for deletion, and it was up for 5 days. (The timespan before something gets deleted with that method) Why the hell you guys didn't something about it OR complain about it until it was too late is beyond me. (Shurgs) -- ZeroGiga 23:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.246.254 (talk)

Regardless of the fact we were late - would it have really hurt to wait while the entry on this page was sorted. As much as I admire your zeal, you'll notice there's now less here written on Cosmo than there is on Mr. Tanaka, and which character played the bigger part? --Danish Ranger 00:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Plus, added on top of that, Cosmo had a full-fledged article, not a tiny stub. Now she has a teeny paragraph that's smaller than even Bokkun's section. Plus, COSMO HAD AN ENTIRE SEASON OF THE SHOW REVOLVING AROUND HER, and her article is replaced with a tiny stub of a section. She's a major character in Sonic X and deserves her own article again. Plus, that was the quickest deletion process I ever saw. I'm not sure if 5 days is enough, as more time would've allowed the people/fans to count in their opinions instead of quickly deleting it. Thank you. 68.197.90.193 (talk) 03:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree Cosmo deserves her own article again.Fairfieldfencer (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Fairfieldfencer

Now that's settled - any volunteers?--Danish Ranger 19:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danish Ranger (talkcontribs)

I have contacted ZeroGiga and he has been very helpful he showed me a place where all the old info was and here it is.Fairfieldfencer (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Fairfieldfencer

I'll do it. I'm on my way. --Luigifan (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
I finished restoring the content of the article, but I haven't been able to restore the pictures. I'll leave that to somebody else. --Luigifan (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou very much its greatly apprecieted.Fairfieldfencer (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Fairfieldfencer

Nice work, fellas. --Danish Ranger 22:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danish Ranger (talkcontribs)

You're welcome. --Luigifan (talk) 02:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Hertia,Cosmo's Mother.jpg

Image:Hertia,Cosmo's Mother.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ChuckThorndyke.jpg

Image:ChuckThorndyke.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chris, Cosmo, and Metarex do not have enough nobility to stand along as articles

Chris Thorndyke does not have enough nobility to pass WP:FICTION, nor does Cosmo and Metarex. Especially Metarex, it has the least nobility of the three. Cosmo has some fancruft which the article can be trimmed. Unless the nobility can asserted, the articles will be merged. Magiciandude (talk) 13:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)