User talk:Liambarnes1995

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hi Liambarnes1995, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

  • Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
  • Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

How you can help:

Additional tips...

  • Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The Image:Signature_icon.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
  • If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
Roleplayer Good luck, and have fun. --Roleplayer (talk) 13:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jamie Clarke, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jamie Clarke was changed by Liambarnes1995 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-03T15:52:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ryne Sanborn.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ryne Sanborn.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jared Fogle, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jared Fogle was changed by Liambarnes1995 (u) (t) deleting 7643 characters on 2008-03-16T19:35:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jared Fogle, you will be blocked from editing. Redrocket (talk) 19:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jared Fogle, you will be blocked from editing. Redrocket (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Liam Barnes

A tag has been placed on Liam Barnes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FusionMix 15:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Liam Barnes. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. FusionMix 15:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Liam Barnes

The article Liam Barnes has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn (talk) 16:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I have removed all the rubbish you have just added about 'New Zealand's Got Talent'. The show doesn't exist, the 'winners' are not worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. I am going to assume good faith and believe that you added these things to improve the encyclopedia, but many would not do so, and considering your track record of vandalism, block you. I advise you keep your nose clean from now on. J Milburn (talk) 16:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy96 17:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)