Talk:Lia Fáil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Lia Fáil is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Celts. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess. The project aims for no vandalism and no conflict. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's importance scale. | |
 |
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale. | |
[edit] A second stone?
I'm sure that those involved in writing this article, and others involved in Irish history/legend, would know better than I, but... when I visited Tara, my tour guide said there was a second stone, taken by the British and since returned, not to Ireland, but to Scotland - he said that the Stone of Scone was not originally Scottish, but in fact was the second stone of Tara. However, neither this article nor that on the Stone of Scone mention this relationship. Was he mistaken? Was he reiterating a common misconception? Thanks. LordAmeth (talk) 08:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
