Talk:Lane Technical College Prep High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Lane Technical College Prep High School has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
April 16, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

I made these changes b/c lane's page did not have any mention of clubs or sports. Elfuegocaliente 16:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Adrian Zmed

Adrian Zmed is the only notable alum? Surely someone more notable than a B-List actor has passed through the doors. Aren't there any alumni who at least own a gas station?

  Johnny Weissmuller (Tarzan) went to Lane but dropped out.

Then he won all those gold medals for swimming. Does that count??

Rkm3612 14:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Is anybody actually making sure this is correct

According to the school's website, Lane produces more future Ph.D. holders than any other high school in the country Is that true?

Yes it is true, here

[edit] Clean Up

We need to do a major clean up of this article.

[edit] Lane Technical High School to Lane Tech College Prep

Can someone put in information when the name change took place?

They're used interchangeably. 76.197.129.137 03:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Famous Lane Tech Alums

Their is no mention of former MTV VJ/commedian Godfrey. Not only did he attend and graduate from Lane Tech, he was also lettered in track & field and football.Randall(Class of 1989):66.158.110.16 02:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Can someone provide Year of graduation for all lane tech alums?

[edit] The Films

I didn't edit it, but I was there when High Fidelity was filmed. They didn't just use the east lawn, they filmed inside too. They took over one of the chem classes across from mine. It's not a big deal, just a bit more accurate than what's on there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.239.20 (talk) 20:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ltlogo.jpg

Image:Ltlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Going to clean this up heavily

I will be cleaning this article up heavily (include citations, add pictures, content, etc) to try and make it up to "good article" standards. If there are any disputes, feel free to talk to me about this here. Mapletip (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: GA review

I am currently reviewing this article. I am confused about a recent edit made by an IP contributor. When were/was the name changed? The 1930s or early 2000s? This is a significant detail and for one edit to change it from 1930s to 2000s is surprising. will381796 (talk) 02:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My GA Review for this article

The requirements for a Good Article are as follows:

1. It is well written. In this respect:

  • I think the intro is well written and helps to point out the main points of the school as well as helps to establish some of its impressive stats early on.
  • The second paragraph in the “contribution to WWII” subsection doesn’t seem to belong there as 1958 is well after the conclusion of WWII. Perhaps a separate subsection?
  • Clean up the Alumni Associate section. Also, perhaps break off the Notable alumni list into a separate section.
  • Double check for grammar and spelling errors. I found a couple very minor errors and corrected them.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:

  • There are some notable alumni that appear to lack citations supporting the fact that they went to the school. Please add citations or remove their names from the list.
  • For the most part, most of the statements are correct and properly cited. I did, however, add “citation needed” tags to several locations within the article. Please cite the source of this information.
  • I am confused about when the name change actually occurred due to a change that an IP editor recently made to the article. Editor 71.201.221.234 made the edit on April 9, 2008. Please verify that this change was correct and NOT vandalism.

3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:

  • The article does an excellent job of covering a great deal of information regarding the school.

4. Does the article maintain Neutrality?

  • The beginning of the subsection “admittance of female students” needs to change. Cut out the intro where you say “one of the most drastic changes.” Seems a little non-neutral to me. Just the facts. The reader doesn’t need to be told this was a drastic change.

5. It is stable. In this respect, it:

  • The article is pretty stable with no major edit wars that I’ve been able to see recently.

6. It is illustrated, where possible and appropriate, by images.[4] In this respect:

  • There are two photos already present and their copyright status appears to be fine.
  • As the school seems to have some pretty unique architectural features, I would love to see some more photographs of the campus. Specifically, Lane Tech Auditorium, Lane Stadium, and the Memorial Garden. If these photos are difficult to get within a short period of time, then fine. I’ll pass it w/o them. But for long term additions, these photos are important.

In conclusion, with the article as it now stands, I am putting the article on hold until the above issues are addressed. So long as they are addressed and no further issues are found, I will be happy to pass this article to GA status. will381796 (talk) 19:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fixes

I have taken your suggestions and completed several of the suggestions. Since I need proper permission to obtain photos of the school, I will not be able to obtain pictures for some time, but I will be happy to put up pictures of the school and events related to the school up asap. Mapletip (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

  • The changes look good so far. I still see several people listed as notable alumni that lack references:
  1. Bill Fischer: College Football Hall of Famer
  2. Bato Govedarica: 1946 All-State basketball player, played at DePaul and in the NBA
  3. John Podesta: President Clinton's chief of staff.
  • Good job on the citations. One last thing that I just noticed is that I think there is undue space given to describing the ethnic clubs for the school. THe reference you cite shows a great number of other non-ethnic clubs. I would steer away from any type of list of clubs and would rather stick with the intro sentence that you already have and then also describe a few other notable clubs or organizations that the school has. For example, is there a National Honor Society chapter at this school? If so, what's the name of the chapter? Have any organizations or clubs participated in any events or won any national championships? Cut out the list you have and see if you can add any of this other information. If you can make these changes (with citations), I'll go ahead and promote the article to GA. But good job so far. will381796 (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Also, some IP editor last night went through and removed all of the citations you inserted for the alumni, so you will need to redo that. Also, I removed from your list Juba Kalamka. This alumni was referenced with a myspace profile. Myspace profiles are not valid references per WP:SOURCES so another source will be needed to return this to the list. will381796 (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review Summary

All of the issues brought forth by this review have been corrected or satisfactorily explained. I am promoting this article to GA status. will381796 (talk) 14:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

A couple of other small issues remain, but I will refrain from delisting at this point. However, please address them as I am uncertain whether this article would pass a GA reassessment:
  • Is it really necessary to link Ph.D. in the lead section?
This is a point that confuses me. Are there certain times when wikilinks are inappropriate? I mean, of course you don't want every word in an article wikilinked, but is there some reason why the Ph.D. wikilink stands out at you and not the Wikilink on carpentry or cabinet making in the history section? will381796 (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Several short sections in the 'history' section -- indication of possible completeness issues (criterion #3). In cases where there is very little text in a subsection, it's generally a good idea to try and integrate it into the main section, using subsections only for very broad topics that have a decent amount of information in them.
I agree here and should have thought about that when I did my review. will381796 (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Article needs a good copyedit; there's some manual of style issues -- some missing punctuation marks at the ends of sentences, some reference citations are out of place (citations should be placed immediately after punctuation, not before the punctuation, and with no space in between).
My understanding on this point from my reading of the MOS is that either placement of citations is correct (before or after punctation) so long as it is consistent throughout the article. will381796 (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • The events subsection under 'school traditions' is really just a short list, and could be expanded to better cover the topic. Most of these events are not cited with sources.
  • There's some improperly linked dates in some of the reference citations used -- please see the manual of style regarding date formatting here. Also, citations should preferably also include a publisher, and a date of publication (not just a date of URL retrieval). If an author is provided, put that in the citation as well.
  • Perhaps 'school traditions' should be combined with 'athletics', since some of these traditions might be related to athletic programs/games?
Good point. will381796 (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • No information in the article on student organizations and student life.
There's a brief mention in the introduction. There used to be a section on clubs but it was nothing more than a list so I recommended either expanding it or getting rid of it...I guess they decided to get rid of it and just give it a brief mention in the intro. will381796 (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hope this helps. Dr. Cash (talk) 04:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Schools of Chicago with Architectural Importance

  • Schurz H.S. (prarie style)
  • Lane Tech H.S. (tudor/gothic)
  • Steimetz H.S. (English gothic)
  • Thorp Academy (Greek revival)Wrightwriter (talk) 05:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)