Talk:Kesgrave
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Racism
I have removed all of the information on the racist accusations. This is because it is a recent internal matter which is not necessary in the article Clake92 (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- It was sourced, and reported in the wider media, which I'd assume makes it a notable incident; Really though, it should be treated in the same way as other villages to avoid any bias in either direction. -- Ratarsed (talk) 08:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
CENSORSHIP IS A BAD THING, CHANGE THE TEXT BUT LEAVE THE SUBJECT ALONE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reg lardez (talk • contribs) 10:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
The entire section about the Route 66 bus and the racist comments made are completely irrelevant. Under the heading of Recent incidents is hardly the place for this minor news article that appeared over six months ago. It also dominates the article about Kesgrave The point made is pathetic as it would only effect local residents travelling from Kesgrave to Martlesham (5 minute journey?) during the morning rush hour and from Kesgrave to Ipswich during the evening rush hour. As this is the opposite direction to 99% of all bus users I cannot see how this is relevant. This fact alone would mean that the residents effected would be minimal. It has clearly been written by someone who views on race are; at best questionable and at worst pure racial hatred. Removal of this section does NOT constitue censorship. Can someone please give me a good reason why it should remain? If I do not receive any comments in the next few days I will remove the entire section. If the article is resubmitted after that then I will move to have the user banned from Wikipedia. 121translation (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
It is up to us in white communities to defend ourselves against intrusive politically correct councils, by whatever means, defending ones community against unfounded allegations is not questionable or racist. This page is also not your sole reserve you can if you want try to get this login banned, but it’s simple enough to set up another and continue unhindered. The story now is old news so will not be reinstated unless further accusations are made. Wikipedia was chosen because a number of sites that take feeds from it therefore promulgating the entry much further than an e-mail to Kesgrave news. Good luck in trying to stop us we are both motivated and organise….. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reg lardez (talk • contribs) 12:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

