User talk:Kaizer13
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
All edits on this page that are not personal (i.e copy and paste messages) will be removed. Except this one below this since people are irrevocably robots here. --Kaizer13 (talk) 21:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Block
You have been blocked for an expiry time of 72 hours due to incivility and personal attacks. This is inappropriate. If you continue to attack other users, your blocking times will continue to increase. Nikki311 15:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Block 2
Your comments are disruptive. Calling me and someone else a Nazi is extremely rude. I find it extremely offensive from a religious perspective, as well. Opinions are welcome, but that really isn't called for. You have a history of these sorts of statements, and your block log also shows a history of incivility. I'm blocking you for 4 days, for said incivility and to prevent more personal attacks. I'm sorry you find administrators to be "Nazi/Fascist/Totalitarians", but I'm just doing my job. If you can't handle the way Wikipedia works, then perhaps it isn't for you. Nikki311 00:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- In defense of this guy here, someone who represses someone else's opinions because they do not agree with it does lean toward right-wingness. --77.106.158.254 (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Abusive edit summaries
This: [1] and [2] are unacceptable. Revert the vandalism or whatever, but don't be rude about it. RobJ1981 (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, still stalking me are you? Do you guys, like, get rewards for preying on people? Or do you just do it because you have absolutely no life to speak of? But hey, knowing you guys, you won't answer, or probably block me yet again. You know why people vandalize? Because they can get away with it. You do absolutely nothing about it. That's why this happens. You've got to tell them when to stop, and saying "Pretty please with sugar on top, don't do that again okay? 3>" won't help. --Kaizer13 (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed you do. Once you hit the radar, as it were, you can kiss your own prejudices goodbye and start to learn to edit cooperatively and with a minimum level of politeness, redneck or not. You either play the game or we take the ball away; simple as that. I'm putting you one a "one strike and you're out" warning. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 00:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] A cup of tea
Hey, I know you feel stressed and all, but trying to invite some "robots" to a cup of tea because they "demonstrate the maturity of an eight-year old" isn't going to help anyone at all. I don't share your opinion, but I think you're entitled to your own opinion it as long as it isn't directed at anyone negatively. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 00:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, you know as well as I do that if robots ingest tea or other liquids they will malfunction. Which would explain a whole lot... --Kaizer13 (talk) 16:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Another disruptive edit.
The revert you made in the article The Beatles was of a photo with a formal fair-use rationale included and is thus allowed in infoboxes. As you seem to have a history of unhelpful editing, I may report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Steelbeard1 (talk) 10:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, okay, fine. I made a mistake. It's just every time I've ever seen a non-free image get put up there, it's been deleted. I get the whole "I'm a new user, let's suck up to the admins" deal. I tried that once myself. If you want to use me as a stepping stone for your no doubt remarkable Wikipedia career, I'm not gonna stop you. --Kaizer13 (talk) 11:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
