User talk:Jouster/AGENDA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Webcomics
What about bias against webcomics? I'm sure I've seen people complain about how we are constantly getting rid of webcomic articles before. I'm not saying we're biased against webcomics, as long as my favorite stays, I'm happy. --LuigiManiac 22:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I've certainly felt that there are some biases in that area, but I've never gone so far as to state a belief that there's an agenda at work. If you can find a reference, though, by all means, add it! Alternately, list it anyway, and put a {{fact}} on it. This isn't the article namespace, so we can be a bit looser with citations. Jouster (whisper) 14:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] HeadOn
I've come across a revision of the Talk:HeadOn page, where a vandal said that we had a bias against, get this, people with HeadOn fetishes. Seeing as how the user put it up in a trollish manner, and I don't think anyone really has HeadOn fetishes, I'm not sure if this should be put up. Here is the revision. --LuigiManiac 12:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- In the hope that this page could eventually be pointed towards whenever someone starts to invoke systematic Wikipedia biases, I'd prefer to keep that kind of in-jest comment off of here. However, if you are sure the vandal was not aware of the page, you can certainly add an "in-jest" section. I trust your (and WP's) judgement. Jouster (whisper) 16:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] La Toya Jackson
This is awesome. WP:ANI#Image_on_La_Toya_Jackson. All this time, I'd been forgetting to hate La Toya Jackson. No more!
Put this here so I can remember to add it to the page once it gets archived and I can do a permanently-valid link. Jouster (whisper) 01:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
