Talk:Johns Hopkins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Maryland (Rated B-Class) (Rated high-importance) Johns Hopkins is part of WikiProject Maryland, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Maryland. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Biography     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: I have provided more inline citations as requested, is it now ready for a quality assessment or an assessment as a quality article ? ----BWyche If you have this on you watchlist Bwyche please remember to sign articles talk with four tildes ~~~~ they were great citations and thanks for the hard work Mike33 06:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC) (edit) WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)      (Rated Start-Class) This article is part of WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers), an attempt to better organise and unify articles relating to the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article is on a subject of mid-importance within Quakerism.
This article has an assessment summary page.

Johns Hopkins was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: February 18, 2007

I feel like there should be a disambiguation page for Johns Hopkins, since it is possible and even probable that most people searching for Johns Hopkins are actually looking for the University, the School of Medicine, or the Hospital. --162.129.236.29 00:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA nomination failed

I have failed this article according to the GA criteria: it needs more references, inline citations (convert the links to inline citations), it needs more expansion and organization, etc. Look to other GAs for examples or let me know if you have any questions. --Nehrams2020 23:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Section too long

In my opinion section 6 is too long and should be split up into smaller, more expressive sections.--Hans555 07:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

This is an awful section, physically makes my head hurt to read it. It seems all conspiracy with no substance, and not even a revelation.

Page seems to be in control of zealot, suggest refer to committee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.78.153 (talk) 12:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Added Cleanup Tags

Not only the last section. The entire article is painfully repetitive and badly written. The article needs a cleaner flow of information. For example it would gain from a consistent chronology that avoids random jumps in the time periods being discussed. The entire discussion of the "other founder" needs to be examined to decide if it is even relevant as this is Johns Hopkins' biographical article, not that other guy. The section titles are also horrid. I mean seriously, a title with a question mark? (see what I did there?) Anyway, good luck to whomever tackles this one, I am afraid I don't have time to give it an overhaul right now. Guardian 07:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Section is pretty bad

Can the whole last section just be removed. It makes no sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.78.153 (talk) 04:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Dear God, this is a horrible article. Bwyche, can you stand aside for some time and let others make some drastic revisions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.73.247.16 (talk) 17:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)