Talk:John Shadegg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Removed stuff about DeLay and Abramoff. There has been nothing linking Shadegg to Abramoff, and Shadegg has opposed DeLay on several occasions, most notably the vote over the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act, in which DeLay and the whip team bribed and blackmailed Congressmen in order to get them to switch votes, yet Shadegg stood fast and voted no.
<DesScorp: 1-16-06 1:40 CST> Well, someone put it back in, then, because there's still a blurb about Shadegg returning money to Abramoff. The implication is that Shadegg had shady dealings with him.
- I added the "dubious" flag to that statement. Shadegg flatly denied the accusation on Fox News Sunday (1/15/2006). --Aeki 22:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Well here is the link (see fr:) http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0112shadegg-donation.html from the Arizona Republic linking about USD 7000 Shadegg received to Abramoff. (:Julien:) 10:44, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- The money came from a person linked to Abramoff, not Abramoff himself. [1] Savantpol 02:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
In two different places on the page different people are listed as his predecessor - at the bottom Bob Stump is listed. In the box at the top right John Kyl is listed. I'm not sure which is correct but someone who knows should fix this. Plymouths 00:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unused public domain image
Here is an orphaned public domain image: Image:John Shadegg.jpg --Strangerer (Talk) 22:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Puff piece
Does anyone get the sense that Shadegg's staff wrote the article? This article reads like a puff piece. --JHP (talk) 04:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Religion?
I just looked at the article and happened to notice that the article text lists the Congressman as Episcopalian but the info box suggests that he is a Mormon (although the info box links to the dab page LDS. Anyone have the correct info? --JohnPomeranz (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind. This appears to have been part of a bit of vandalism by an unregistered user. I've corrected it.
- --JohnPomeranz (talk) 22:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

