Talk:John Arlott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Cricket Portal Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability John Arlott is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: not checked Categories and templates: not checked

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Should "freaker" not be "streaker"? Britmax 07:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The point is that dear John got the word wrong! He said freaker because he had forgotten the correct word streaker. It made it all the funnier as I recall! PaddyBriggs 09:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thought it might be something like that so I didn't just edit it. Thamks! Britmax 21:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Expanded some aspects

The article didn't mention that he became a cricket commentator because he was already working for the BBC as a talk producer; I also expanded the references to his wine writing and poetry/fiction.KD Tries Again 18:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)KD

[edit] WP Cricket importance rating

Taking his broadcasting and his writing together, I think he merits a "high" rather than a "mid", and I've altered it accordingly. JH (talk page) 18:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Arlott.jpg

Image:Arlott.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)