Talk:João Magueijo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
João Magueijo is part of WikiProject Portugal, a project to improve all Portugal-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Portugal-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.


Reworded the comments about his book (first section) - seemed to contain too much personal opinion. 141.35.111.109 14:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Deleted this badly worded "Let's add a rebutal to this theory of light as not a constant. First a contradiction, if light at the moment of the Big Bang was faster than it is now, would not the light we see now be in fact the light from the moment of the big bang. Would we ever see the light after the Big Bang? That contradicts the observation made by Nobel Prize winner George Smoot, he in facts has seen the light fromm 300,000 years after the Big Bang." which was stuck in the biography section. -User:Praguestepcihld, 22 January 2006

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inflation is main stream

Twice now the phrase more mainstream (before "theory of cosmic inflation") has been deleted without explanation or edit summary. As far as I know this is considered the mainstream theory and the cosmic inflation article says that it is now considered part of the standard hot big bang model. The person making this change should explain why it is necessary. Belief that the mainstream theory is wrong is not good reason to change the encyclopedia. That happens when mainstream scientific opinion changes. SpinningSpark 12:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)