Talk:Jefferson Memorial
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the discussion/talk page for: Jefferson Memorial.
Contents |
[edit] Topics from 2004
[edit] Dedication
Was it true that the memorial was dedicated on the 200th anniversary of Jefferson's birth, or am I making that up? Mike H 11:44, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Well, yeah. It says so in the article. --TheCoffee 13:57, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Doesn't mean that it's true. I'm not sure exactly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.239.249 (talk) 21:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Topics from 2006
[edit] Infobox and image placement
I just added the protected area infobox to the page, and had a particularly tough time adjusting the images -- trying to get a good one near the top left. The problem mostly comes from the long Table of Contents. I did a much better job just now on the Lincoln Memorial, but the best solution for this one eluded me. If anyone has a better idea for image placement, please give it a try. — Eoghanacht talk 22:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
I just uploaded a number of photos from the 2006 Cherry Blossoms. Gallery -- These photos primarily include the Tidal Basin, Washington Monument, Jefferson Memorial, FDR Memorial, and National Mall. If you have any specific requests for images, just leave a message on my Talk page I should be able to get those by mid-June. Provide as much detail as you can for what you are looking for in the image. --Thisisbossi 04:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Topics from 2008
[edit] Retrofit year-topic headers
29-April-2008: I have added the headers "Topics from 2004" (etc.), between the topics above, to emphasize dates of topics, in the style of other talk-pages. -Wikid77 (talk) 06:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image placement 2008
29-April-2008: The left/right images had crowded the text to one-word width for 800x600 screens, so I shifted the images into wider areas, moving the construction/interior images nearer the related text. The image-placement now fits for either small/large screens, avoiding text gaps at 1024x768 resolution. A prominent change is that the construction image appears beside the "Construction" subheader, rather than at the "History" subheader. -Wikid77 (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Wikid77, i have been meaning to catch up to you because I noticed you authored the template {{infobox nrhp map}}. There's a new alternative that overlaps in functionality, {{infobox_nrhp2}}. I applied it in this article just now to demonstrate it. This NRHP2 infobox is narrower and doesn't look as good in some ways for this article: it compresses the included image which looked better before. It also displays a map, which probably should be turned off from being displayed. However, it was incorrect for this article to be claiming that the site is an IUCN Category V (Protected landscape/seascape). It is "protected" but it is not a natural area, so is not a Protected area, and in fact it is not listed by the WPDA. See current conversations in WikiProject Protected Areas at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Protected areas#Revisiting NPS areas, dropping many of them from this WikiProject and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Protected areas#Jefferson Memorial and in WikiProject NRHP at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Updated infobox for nrhp?. doncram (talk) 11:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- I removed the map by blanking the locmapin parameter. There is an image_size parameter for infobox nrhp2 that can be set to any number to display the image at that width if needed. All of this is explained at Template:Infobox nrhp2/doc. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 16:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

