User talk:Jazzmand

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

• Jazzmand (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • • [http://en.wikipedia.org../../../../articles/i/p/b/Special%7EIpblocklist_2536.html unblock)
• 195.33.166.40 (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • ipblocklist • rangeblocks • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock)
• Block message:

Vandalism-only account

• Blocking admin: WBOSITG (talk • autoblocks • blocks)

• Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have been blocked for changing the word India with South Asia in the page of Sanskrit. Intially it said ""Sanskrit (संस्कृता वाक् saṃskṛtā vāk, for short संस्कृतम् saṃskṛtam) is a classical language of India, a liturgical language of Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, and one of the 23 official languages of India"" and I changed it to Sanskrit (संस्कृता वाक् saṃskṛtā vāk, for short संस्कृतम् saṃskṛtam) is a classical language of South Asia, a liturgical language of Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, and one of the 23 official languages of India. Because India as a country as now exist since 1947 whereas Sanskrit in the other hand is an ancient language of the whole region in south asia and is the mother language of most of the South Asian languages. With this argument it is wrong to write that it is a classical langauge of India. Instead it should be written It is Classical language of South Asia"

Decline reason: "Yes, but it is a classical language of what is now India. It is spoken as an official language only in that country. You are not blocked purely for that; your other edits have been unconstructive as well. You have edit warred on this article, and other than that you have made no useful contributions. You should really have discussed changes on the talk page of the article. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 09:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "It is wrong what you are saying Sanskrit is not an official language of India. If you are saying that on the basis of what is written is wikipedia then I have nothing to say. I just want that people who wants to find information in Wikipedia have a right to know the truth not an advertisment of a country. Yes I have made some changes in other pages as well. In the page Lumbini. The place is in Nepal there is no doubt you also agree. So there is no need to mention there that it is near indian border. If the page is about Amsterdam then there is no need to say that it is near German border. Or lets write in page Taj Mahal that it is near the Nepali border. Lumbini is an important place, it is the birthplace of Gautam Buddha, thats why India wants to have its name whenever it comes about Buddha so that they can make people believe that Buddha was born in India, which is wrong. If Lumbini was of no importance then India or Indians would not even care to have their name mentioned anywhere near Lumbini. There is a discussion going on in Gautam Buddha page about his birthplace. If it is like you said above ""Yes, but it is a classical language of what is now India. It is spoken as an official language only in that country."" Lumbini is now in Nepal, so Gautam Buddha was born in Nepal. As for Sanskrit it is a classical language of the whole south asia. India in the other hand is just a coutry since 1947 in its current form and with the name India. Name India itself was given by British during when they had colonized most of the small countries in the region. Lets take Latin as an example, which is classical language of western europe ""Latin (lingua Latīna, pronounced [laˈtiːna]) is an ancient Indo-European language that was spoken in the Roman Kingdom, the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire. It was also the de facto international language of science and scholarship in mid and western Europe until the 17th century. taken from Latin page of wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin So it would be wrong to say that Latin is a classical language of Germany"

Decline reason: "You don't need to persuade me that you are right. Whether you are right or wrong is not relevant to your block. Edit-warring is disruptive and pointless; when Wikipedia editors disagree, they don't edit-war, they discuss their desired changes on the talk page until they reach consensus. You didn't do that, and you haven't convinced us that, if unblocked, you would seek consensus on the talk page instead of edit-warring on the article. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.