User talk:James086/2008/Archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Strauß
Hello James. I'm surprised to see that you restarted the requested move at Talk:Franz Josef Strauß. I think that this shouldn't have happened before a month or two had past since the canvass. Regards, Húsönd 02:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
For what it is worth James, while the initial closure struck me as unfortunate, I agreed with you and after many disagreed with the closure you opened it up again after a few days, as was proper on a consensus based project (whether those asking for the re-opening were too hasty is for them to decide, not you IMO). I don't see anything wrong in your actions and do not feel you have anything to regret or feel embaressed or such over. Infact I admire that you were willing to override your own previous decision when people asked. Hope the experience doesn't sour you to the understaffed WP:RM. Narson (talk) 10:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
 |
Dear friend, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Eve, and that 2008 is your best year yet! ~ Riana ⁂ 02:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
 |
Happy New Year
 |
Hello James, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ~ Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
 |
Strauss
Your opinion might be helpful at WP:ANI#Please halt this as you closed the original RM discussion. —Random832 18:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
A request for your consideration regarding CAT:AOTR
| Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
|---|
|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "H"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "I"s, "J"s, and "K"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++Lar: t/c 20:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Response to a vandal revert
No... its not quite vandalism. Vandalism would be if I made up stuff, much like your run of the mill retar... I mean born agains do. I just pointed out that they are an extreme minority, even here in the US, and that most sane people don't like them. Thought it made the article better myself. And by the way, I'm flattered you care enough to follow my edits on two seperate articles. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.144.161.219 (talk) 09:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually adding the text "However, those in the know know that they all did it for the lulz!" most certainly is vandalism. James086Talk | Email 09:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
dickhead
please dire in a fire, tomorrow, at your house ¦-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.155.129 (talk) 11:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:GEM Monopoly box.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GEM Monopoly box.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 15:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Copy of Deleted Article Sri Asaramayan
Hi James,
Can you please provide me the copy of the deleted article Sri Asaramayan. I was away on holidays and couldn't get a chance to see and reply to the discussions of deletion of that article. I am yet to ask the administrator who deleted the article as well. But in the mean time if I can get the copy from you, it will be great.
Thanks Rohit (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Re. Strauß / Strauss
That's okay, I wasn't mad about this situation or anything. :-) Thank you for contacting me about it though, your gesture was genuinely appreciated. Best regards, Húsönd 16:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank
I am not a Nazi :D. I did it for Wikipedia because some Nazi use this template as a fact that Wikipedia allows editors use Anti-Nazi icon on Userpage and troll Wiki-Vi >.< Userpage: [1] and he/she said [2]
40px
Bởi vì các wiki khác đều cho phép sử dụng hình này trong trang thành viên: bằng chứng là họ có infobox đây:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:User_no-nazi
In English ( I translate he/she didn't say)
Because another Wikipedia let its editors use this image on their userpage. In fact, they have this infobox:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:User_no-nazi
ya. Gl and HF
Magnifier (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Barrachois Harbour Yacht Club
Hi James. I'm getting ready to reinstate the Barrachois Harbour Yacht Club entry if you don't mind, with complete information on why we're significant, I can send you four or five articles about our Club from Atlantic Boating News (www.atlanticboatingnews.com) When I launched the page this past summer, we were at sea on vacation and really didn't have time/opportunity to perhaps go into depth as much as I could have. (i.e.- SUPERB hurricane hole, as evidenced by Hurricanes Gustav (2002) and Hurricane Juan (2003), which pretty much destroyed marinas in Halifax and Pictou, Nova Scotia and two marinas in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. Our Club burgee has been added to Yacht Club page as an example because New York Yacht Club yanked theirs over copyright issues. Not a problem with us, as I designed the Burgee and released it to the public domain.
Discussion would be most welcome. Thank you!
Aloha27 (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Image
You recently deleted an image on the 'antistatic mats' page. We own the image and use on our website. Could you explain the reasons why it was delete (in plain English), as I dont understand the technicalities of why it was deleted. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seb-Gibbs (talk • contribs) 15:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
 |
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which which passed nem. con. with 45 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thank you for your support and all the kind words that were expressed. I will try to live up to the trust placed in me by the community. I now have my homework to do and then pass the Marigolds. |
- Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Image
You recently deleted an image on the 'antistatic mats' page. We own the image and use on our website. Could you explain the reasons why it was delete (in plain English), as I dont understand the technicalities of why it was deleted. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seb-Gibbs (talk • contribs) 15:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- The image Image:Antistatic-mat.gif that you uploaded was licensed (an image license says where and under what conditions the image may be used) only for use on Wikipedia. While this may seem an appropriate way to license images, Wikipedia aims to be reusable so that it could be printed by someone or put on disc etc. That means that an image permitted for use on Wikipedia could not be reproduced. Also, while Wikipedia isn't commercial, images that aren't permitted for commercial use aren't allowed either because it is designed to be re-usable by anyone, even if that is for commercial gains.
- In order to use an image on Wikipedia, there may only be a few restrictions on its re-use. It would be hard to explain, so I will provide examples of licenses that are allowed, hopefully this will make it easier to understand:
-
- Public domain: This means the image is completely free, the person who made it has released all rights so that anyone can use it for any purpose with no restrictions.
- Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY): Anyone can use it for any purpose, the only condition is that the original author of the image must be credited.
- Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike (CC-BY-SA): Anyone can use it for any purpose, the only conditions are that the original author of the image must be credited and when re-used it must be under the same license. This means you can't edit the picture and then make it copyright.
- These are the preferred licenses, and while there are more, they are very similar to these in conditions. If you own the rights to the image, then you may license it under one of these licenses (or similar)and it can be uploaded to Wikipedia. If you do not, you could take a photo of an antistatic mat and license it as you choose. I hope it's not too much to take in, I was very confused at first, but I now find myself explaining licensing to many others. If you have more questions feel free to ask. Thanks, James086Talk | Email 03:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Article
Could I have the text of the deleted article List of Dragon Ball special abilities? Earthbendingmaster (talk) 19:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind. Earthbendingmaster (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, thats perfectly ok. I already have it anyway. Cheers. Earthbendingmaster (talk) 03:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thank you for your constructive criticism and input in making Alpha Kappa Alpha a featured article.
Best,
miranda 08:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Project Blades
Hi,
The members of WP Football keep getting their knickers in a twist about wanting to delete the Sheffield United project (or subsime it into some taskforce thing). (See here) I've headed them off at the pass so far but more views and consensus on the Blades project page might be of help.
Thanks Bladeboy1889 (talk) 13:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Email
I'm guessing Frankie didn't respond to our email? David Fuchs (talk) 00:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I guess... what email account did you use? Perhaps a school or .edu account will work better (assuming they have a spam filter that eats up free email addresses.) David Fuchs (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's possible... I'll send an email tomorrow. For now, it's off to the real world. Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) 02:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
WP:ACID Nom
Hello James, I have nominated the Ford Falcon (Australia) article for WP:ACID, for reasons such as improving the general Australian car category (because that both you and I know it is an important article) and others. If you believe that it should be improved to FA, could you please cast a vote for it? Much appreciated HarrisonB - Talk 05:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of page about Loyola College
Hi there. A page about Loyola College i recently created has been deleted. I read the reason but didnt understand very well. I Would appreciate it if you could explain for me. I would be happy to fix the problem or remove what ever it was from the article that may have been innapropriate to wikipedia guide lines =) thanks
By the way i tried to include the source which was a link to the school website but i dont think i did it right... please help
School now has a source
Hi James 086. The Loyola college home page has now been added as a source. I'm not sure how the message at the top saying it doesnt cite any refrences can be removed but i assume someone will. By the way can you tell me why the page appears differently to most other wiki pages. I cant quite pin point its exact difference but somehow it appears unique as if missing certain default features found on other pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ADude8 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Ok
I had idea that, wikipedia will not hurt to others. But what to do without waiting. Ok I will not remove but the administrator will take care of this issue.--Librarianpmolib (talk) 10:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Admin Coaching Re-confirmation
Hello, previously you expressed interest in participating in the Wikipedia:Admin coaching project. We are currently conducting a reconfirmation drive to give coaches the opportunity to update their information and capacity to participate in the project. Please visit Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status to update your status. Also, please remember to update your capacity (5th table variable) in the form of a fraction (eg. 2/3 means you are currently coaching 2 students, and could accept 1 more student). Thank you. MBisanz talk 09:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
*wave* Hi! :D
Hi! I was recently paired with you by User:Mbisanz for admin coaching. I wanted to take the opportunity to introduce myself to you. I am currently a junior year undergrad student majoring in mechanical engineering. I first joined Wikipedia in 2006, but didn't actively edit until October of last year.
In January, I was nominated for adminship, but for several reasons, including only being active for three months (which technically really would have been four months), I did not show enough experience to the editors to get the mop. I was recommended to receive admin coaching, so here I am! :-)
I'd like to work on narrowing down different WP:CSD categories (especially when some new articles fall into multiple categories), how to effectively proceed with AfDs (how to AfD an article with NPOV, judging objectively, properly keeping discussions civil, and possibly close AfD discussions), and properly participate in wiki IRC to interact with more editors to gain more experience.
I currently work on WP:NPP using WP:FRIENDLY (I can tag articles, but I can't seem to find where to click to send the generic welcome user-talk template) in conjunction with WP:TWINKLE. In addition, I patrol articles on several categories with WP:AWB, including typo fixes, fixing formatting errors, tagging proper project banners, etc. I also manage the WikiProject Universities Collaborations of the Fortnight as well as managing most of WikiProject Robotics.
I was also recommended by another editor recently to perhaps begin to create new articles in my field of interest on WP:RA. Although I love the sound of that, I keep finding wonderful existing articles in my fields of interest including robotics, mechanical engineering, and others. Any help in narrowing down which topics I should start articles on would also be great.
I understand this is a lot to ask of you, and seeing that you already have two other students, I know I'll be stretching you very thin, but I'll be stretched thin as well. My academic studies in conjunction with the fast approach to my senior year academic design project that is required to complete for my bachelors degree, I'll have a lot of time before I will even think of accepting another RfA nomination at least until May, if not later, so I hope in the several months to come, I may learn much from you. Anyways, a brief bio including a link to my previous RfA is on my userpage, which feel free to browse around! I look forward in learning from you! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 09:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Point of clarification: James086 has volunteered a capacity of 0/1. If you two hit it off, he'll be at 1/1. That was just an example above. MBisanz talk 10:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
First thing to ask... haha
Hey! How's it going? I'm in a bit of a bind here. I'm trying to see if I can settle this proposed change of the WikiProject Universities infobox (discussion here). I really don't see how changing fields (and particularly, the chain reactions the proposed changes will affect) will help the WikiProject. I've just started an informal voting to get a jist of what the general vibe from the editors is. Personally, I'm against this change, but I just can't find the proper words to convince them that the problem right now is the editor who inputted the data into the article in the first place may have made errors and it is not the fault of the infobox necessarily.
- Oppose: current system has made adaptations to accommodate a majority of university articles on Wikipedia. Main argument at the moment revolves around few articles with specific needs that can be solved with simple line breaks (<br />). Although pointing out weaknesses in wiki templates is encouraged to provide better revisions of current standards, this particular string of edits does not seem very constructive to the WikiProject. Making changes that affects the thousands of article this WikiProject affects based off of few individual articles shows the unwillingness of the original nominator's inflexibility and lack of knowledge in infoboxes themselves. No offense or anything. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 01:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm seriously thinking someone's going to whack me with a WP:CIVIL bat, so I was wondering if I could get a second opinion (you know, the third person always sees the clearest?), refining my wording, perhaps you might understand where I'm coming from and identify the thing I cannot put into words for some reason. Any help would be great! Thanks! (Oh yeah, if you're on AIM, my s/n is "Jameson L Tai"...yeah I know, not very creative. hahah) - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 01:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Your CSD Essay
It's really nice and provides some pretty good insights to some of my CSD discussions. A couple of questions though...
- G4: If the article was speedy deleted before, can I nominate for CSD G4?
- Articles with titles that does not correspond with the article whatsoever, what should I do with those?
Thanks for your help with this. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 02:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Admin coaching request
Hello, you have yourself listed as a coach on the Admin coaching status page. I was wondering if you would be so kind as to coach me. Or at least offer up more advise than simply "visit AfD". I apparently have a problem with diversity but I can't find a way around it. I just don't know enough about the differnt subjects to think I can make a worthwile contribution. And I don't know how to look for vandals and other things. Any response would be appreciated. Padillah (talk) 02:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
AWB
As per the AWB rules of use please avoid making inconsequential changes. Thanks, Rich257 (talk) 10:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Template:XD5
I just noticed that template:XD5 was deleted by you? XD5 and other XD* templates are historical, and probably should be kept. Please undelete at earliest convenience. Thanks for your time!--Kim Bruning (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. See WP:XD for whence they came from, btw. :-) --Kim Bruning (talk) 04:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Daewoo Royale
Hi James, could please move the Daewoo Royale Series article to Daewoo Royale? Because the redirect already exists, the software will not let me make the move. By the way do you know anything about this car? Apparently it is based on the Holden Commodore, but so little information is available. OSX (talk • contributions) 09:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Streamlink
Hi, User:Chris Rodgers has expressed some concerns over the deletion of an article I tagged last night. You were the deleting administrator and I would like you to take a look his arguments on my talk page and contact him if necessary. I have already left him a friendly message about the deletion process.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 23:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- TWW's response was helpful and a worthy example for wiki discussion, but my reply on his talk page explains in clear detail why the article did not qualify for a speedy kill (as opposed to even a rewrite or VfD tag). Anticipating also your significance comment above, it also explains why the article is significant. Especially as fast as new articles fly by these days now, I take you at your word when you say above that you're capable of mistakes like the rest of us. If you want to suggest points for improvement, I'm open to them, but it is/was definitely not the advertising/non-encyclopedic speedy-delete material that G11 provides for, and I'd appreciate your reviewing my comment there and restoring the thing. Thanks. Chris Rodgers (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Article moves
Hi again, could you also move these articles to more correct titles:
- ACP Magazines Limited --> ACP Magazines (more common name).
- Toyota Highlander --> Toyota Kluger (WikiProject Automobiles states that the nameplate of the original country (Japan) should be used).
- Sedan (car) --> Sedan (redundant title).
Cheers OSX (talk • contributions) 09:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Possibly promising
I resent your image request through Bungie.net messaging to Jarrad, O'Connor, et al, and Luke Smith actually responded, so we might be making some headway (I had to explain to him our fair use policies suck :P) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 11:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
 |
Hi James086/2008/Archive1! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3).
|
April 2008
- You have been blocked for violation of our signature policy. Wait, we have a signature policy...well we do now! Tiptoety talk 01:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
{
- You cant unblock yourself! Admin abuse! Admin abuse! Tiptoety talk 01:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, wait.... *starts to panic* Shit, and here comes de-syoping. Tiptoety talk 02:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Sig
I want to beat the hell out of your sig, seriously! lol ~ Riana ⁂ 04:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
"Admin vision"
Not that I really care since I'm not a sysop, but this code in Sysop.js is not going to work because addLink() is not defined. P.S. Please do NOT reply on my talk page. —AlexSm 04:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I found it a bit strange that it hadn't worked, but I have reverted now. Thanks for explaining though. You! - Crank dat Soulja 08:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
AFDs...
So I've closed the second and third one... The first one's kind of tricky. So I'll need a little bit more time to work this one out. I've got loads of research and assignments due this week, including my junior engineer design poster presentation on Friday's Senior Engineering Design Showcase. I'll try to do the first one some time within a day or so. Sorry for taking so long. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Yay! I'm done! :D Sorry it took so long. Hope you're having an OK week! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 14:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
status update
Just so you know, I responded to your query at Talk:Flood (Halo) about the image; as for the Bungie images, Luke hasn't responded to my last message, so I may have to bug them again. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- by the by... what kind of info does the Halo Effect have? If it's got some good out of universe info, I'll prolly buy it off Amazon. (I still need to get a print copy of Contact Harvest so I can source stuff when I get to working on Covenant (Halo)...) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
