User talk:Ivanstreaky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy deletion of Charles E. Crutchfield III

A tag has been placed on Charles E. Crutchfield III, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

This issue has already been decided by an article for deletion discussion, the outcome of which was to delete. The consensus was Dr. Crutchfield did not meet notability standards, and that he had tried on more than one occasion to use his article for promotional purposes, including having someone create the article on his behalf. Attempts to re-create this article without going through the deletion review process will be futile, as they are blatant violations of Wikipedia policy. I suggest that any further efforts on this subject will be a waste of time, and better directed elsewhere. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)