User talk:Isa gajre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Isa gajre! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 10:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Spelling reform do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bonadea (talk) 11:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Saaspel. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Yngvarr 13:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hallo Bonadea !!!!!!!

Ich bin Anfänger bei Wikipedia und deswegen habe ich die an mich gerichteten talks nicht gesehen.

Was mich aber die ganze Zeit stört, ist dass Sie ständig Saaspel löschen. Ich würde gerne den Grund dafür wissen, da Saaspel genau so untergeordnet war wie alle anderen >> Spelling reform external links << Bitte erklären Sie mir, warum Sie Saaspel als spam einstufen und alle anderen external links, mit gleichem Thema nicht?

Ich werde Saaspel noch einmal eintragen und bitte Sie es nicht mehr zu löschen. Ich bin nicht der Saaspel Autor aber ein Mitglied.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isa gajre (talk • contribs) March 8, 2008

Responding in English, because it is discouraged to communicate in other languages on English Wikipedia, unless either person doesn't understand English. The link to the Saaspel project is inserted without any explanatory text what it is about, only a slogan in that language. The link points to your own website which gives the appearance of self-promotion; even if you are not the site's author you previously signed your name Roy W. Blain - and as a contributor to the site it is still a conflict of interest for you to link to it. Please see the conflict of interest guidelines for information about why it is not a good idea to link to one's own projects. Please note that Wikipedia should never be used for promotional purposes, of ideas, web sites, people or services.

In the article English spelling reform there are no other external links to specific spelling reform projects, so it seems quite straightforward that you shouldn't include it there. In the article Spelling reform there are several such external links. I will look into which ones appear to be really relevant for the page, and which ones can probably be pruned. --Bonadea (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)