Talk:IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve tax-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the Project's priority scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's comments page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

This is undoubtedly machine translated.

-fixed (somewhat...), and added stub tag. N. Paul Inast 15:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Merge Forms Only. — Morphh (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

I suggest we merge all these U.S. Forms (and any others) and "IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program" into a new article titled United States tax forms or Tax forms in the United States. If it is too big, we could merge all the 1040 Forms into one and add a summary style to the main article. Offer preference of article title if you have one. Morphh (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Support

  1. Morphh (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Partial support: Forms only, none of the IRS programs should be included Hansonc 03:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. I agree. All Forms Only. Andrew 00:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I think the VITA article doesn't really belong on a United States tax forms page, since it is a program not a form. -Moorlock 21:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Ok... what about the other forms...? Morphh (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I posted to Moorlock's talk - It appears his concern was the VITA article, which the others also opposed. Morphh (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)