User talk:Immblueversion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Immblueversion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Miranda 21:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] to check shows status

If you were unaware, thefutoncritic is usually updated pretty swiftly regarding news of a shows status. http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings.aspx?id=20070914fox19&date=10/07/07 Family Guy has technically only been picked up for its 6th production cycle with ongoing negotiations. Although American Dad was just recently picked up for a 4th production cycle taking it through the 2008-2009 season and possibly later if holdover episodes add up. Same thing for family guy. Since regular seasons are around 22 eps, and there are 22 production season 6 episodes, some of those will be part of season 7 automatically as they are already a few eps in and still have a few more production season 5 eps to burn off before they even start 6x01 "Play It Again, Brian". Hope this helps. Grande13 01:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] another little note

It was noted at one of the table reads, and possibly is even included in one of the sourced articles, but in the episode following Stewie Kills Lois, is titled Lois kills stewie. In the article i read it wasn't clearly stated what episode this was to occur, but Stewie was to travel back in time to bring Lois back to life, hence her role will not be in jeopardy in any future episodes....so not sure if you want to keep that note on the LOIS character page, as they aren't killing her character off for good. Grande13 01:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:77181.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:77181.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:77179.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:77179.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] episode templates

Before any further edits its probably best to just discuss the viewpoints. I feel its in the best interest to include all the titles. First of all they are confirmed and we all know despite what a select few think, that these episodes will air this season, and going even farther for family guy we have a directors input with the list of production codes and titles, which gives a fairly accurate representation of the order as episodes tend to air somewhat in production order. Anyways, along the bottom of the template it states order is subject to change, so it seems fine that the episode list includes all titles as they are all confirmed titles. Also, clicking on an episode with no info other than title/production code redirects you to the current episode page to the specific section that tells you of upcoming plots and gives you another list of the titles that have been confirmed along with a few other notes. Grande13


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Peter griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Peter griffin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 01:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lois.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lois.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Stewie griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stewie griffin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 01:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Brian griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Brian griffin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Chris griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chris griffin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Meg griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Meg griffin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Loooooois.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Loooooois.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brian griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brian griffin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chris griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris griffin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brian griffin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brian griffin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chris griffin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris griffin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Age incrementing to Family Guy character infoboxes

This episode skips forward by one year, so every character should have aged accordingly.

I really think this bit of original research should be kept out of articles, especially infoboxes.

Unless the show indicates this, we can not assume they will reconcile this as if it had occurred in real time. It would be more reasonable to expect FG to return to status quo, perhaps without any effort to reconcile the time continuity.

Also, we're halfway through a two part episode. This situation can all be undone by in many ways, such as asking Death for time travel options. / edg ☺ ☭ 01:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

No response, huh? / edg ☺ ☭ 03:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-consensus editing

At this point you seem to be edit warring in Peter Griffin. Can you please discuss these changes? Wikipedia relies on editors acting cooperatively. If you continue to edit contrary to WP:CONSENSUS, you may be blocked. / edg ☺ ☭ 23:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Let me also point to Wikipedia:Avoid statements that will date quickly. You can't get any more dated than a status quo change in the middle of a two-part episode. Please stop inserting this original research based on a single-episode situation. Please undo your changes. / edg ☺ ☭ 23:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Peter Griffin. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. This applies to other Family Guy articles as well. / edg ☺ ☭ 23:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your change to Stewie Loves Lois

Hey :) I noticed your change to Stewie Loves Lois. Just this evening, I spent over an hour watching the DVD and adding to the article to create a deatiled plot synopsis, only for you to change it back here. Please discuss such significant changes on the talk page. Thank you, ~ Qst 22:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Excessive episode detail in Family Guy articles

I appreciate the effort you're making to contribute to Family Guy articles, but excessive plot detail and analysis of what different occurrences mean about the character are not encyclopedic. Please give the following pages a read so you can have a sense of what is needed, and what will need to be removed. (This will save you a lot of frustration in the long run!)

What Wikipedia's FG articles need more than anything else is "out-of-universe" information. Since these characters are not real people, and the show is not significantly serialized, there is no point in piling on details from every episode as if this were a historical account. It just make articles longer, harder to read, and unrealistic.

If you really enjoy logging all the stories from Family Guy in detail, Wikipedia might not be the best wiki for your energies, but Family Guy Wiki might really appreciate this sort of attention. I periodically contribute to that site, but mostly by linking Wikipedia articles on Family Guy to FGwiki. They could use more editors to help with writing new articles and detailing existing ones. / edg ☺ ☭ 04:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I notice you are continuing with this sort of editing. Can you please at least reply to some of these solicitations? It's really important to address concerns like this. / edg ☺ ☭ 23:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Something, Something, Something Dark Side

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Something, Something, Something Dark Side, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Collectonian (talk) 04:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Something, Something, Something Dark Side

Something, Something, Something Dark Side, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Something, Something, Something Dark Side satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something, Something, Something Dark Side and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Something, Something, Something Dark Side during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 09:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Peter Griffin. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please explain the removal of content; the next time you remove content from articles. User Doe ☻T ☼C 22:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

  • Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Funeral for a Fiend. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Scorpion0422 01:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stewie/Lois Kills... episodes

Please do not detail episodes in character pages. These are not biographies of real people. This has been brought up before on your talk page, and you persist in adding this information without any discussion.

Episode detail for Stewie Kills Lois and Lois Kills Stewie belong on those episode pages. Please do not clutter the character pages with this information. Please discuss these things if you disagree with this. Persistent editing against consensus may be considered vandalism, and may get your account blocked.

I'm trying to be helpful here. Your apparently well-intended contributions are becoming disruptive. It's really important that you change course, preferably by participating in discussion; lacking that, please refrain from non-consensus editing. / edg ☺ ☭ 23:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heritiage links from Family Guy character articles

I'm noticing the articles for German American and Irish American look pretty helpful for this purpose. Might it be a better idea to link to these instead of German and Irish? American immigrant communities tend to differ substantially from those in their home countries. / edg ☺ ☭ 04:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] family guy guest stars

Im not exactly sure what you're doing, but you're removing valid guest stars...for example in wasted talent you removed adam corolla...so whats going on? Grande13 (talk)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Stewie Loves Lois, you will be blocked from editing. —Qst 08:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Peter griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Peter griffin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Family-guy-chris-griffin3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Family-guy-chris-griffin3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Family-guy-peter-griffin8.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Family-guy-peter-griffin8.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Family-guy-stewie-griffin1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Family-guy-stewie-griffin1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting back to your preferred status

Immerblueversion, you have been asked before not to make large changes to articles back to your preferred version without discussion on the talk page. I have spent hours working on Stewie Loves Lois since I began my work on it to get it to good article status, yet you keep repeatedly reverting back to your preferred status. This has got to stop, the article was at a start class status when I began work on it, now it at a B, so please, stop reverting my edits to your preferred version, or you may be blocked. Qst 16:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stewie Loves Lois. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. SQLQuery me! 11:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stewie kills lois.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stewie kills lois.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to List of Family Guy episodes. Thank you. Your ongoing lack of discussion, especially when editing against WP:CONSENSUS, remains troubling. If you don't wish to participate in discussions, please at least use edit summaries to state the intentions behind your edits. / edg ☺ ☭ 22:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Giant chicken.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Giant chicken.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Family-guy-peter-griffin8.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Family-guy-peter-griffin8.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:StewieKillsLois.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:StewieKillsLois.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 00:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Family-guy-peter-griffin8.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Family-guy-peter-griffin8.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 01:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Editing without consensus

Hello, Immblueversion. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you. Qst 15:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverted your edits

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Family Guy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hi, I reverted your edits to Family Guy due to their lack of encyclopedic value and misleading nature. Please stop adding the section about a "possible feature length movie", it is not only misleading, but is also based on original research and not full blown evidence. If you continue to add the section, I will continue to report your edits as vandalism. Also, please pay attention to notes written within the article, such as the one written directly above the section you added. It states further reason why you shouldn't add the section to begin with.Milonica (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

After seeing your other recent contributions, yet again about the film series...

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Stewie Griffin: The Untold Story, you will be blocked from editing. Milonica (talk) 03:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Peter griffin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Peter griffin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Mcstroke.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mcstroke.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Episode navigation

Please stop adding episode navigation to Family Guy episode articles; they are against consensus. I'm going to file an RfC against you now, as your behaviour has been apalling in terms of abiding by community consensus. Qst (talk) 23:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Family-guy-stewie-griffin1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Family-guy-stewie-griffin1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stewie Loves Lois.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stewie Loves Lois.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mcstroke.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mcstroke.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

With respect, I, and others, have tried asking you politely and firmly to stop editing without consensus on Family Guy pages, and you have ignored all of our requests and continued to make significant changes to articles without prior discussion on the talk page, as well as reverting to your preferred version of articles. This time, I'm serious and if you continue to do so, I will file a request for comment, which could, ultimately, lead to a blocking of your account for a desired period of time. This is a final warning. Qst 16:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ernieasbobafett.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ernieasbobafett.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that; I got that image myself, so I'd figure why it would be deleted. Also, is this the way I respond to these talk pages? Because I honestly don't know any other way for me to do so. So if you get this message, can you tell me whether this is okay or not? And sorry for any trouble I may have caused in the past, and I did get that warning. Just understand that I'm still not used to all of this. Thanks. Immblueversion 01:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ernieasbobafett.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ernieasbobafett.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

You can delete the image if you feel it is necessary, as I have not gained any permission, and I apologize.Immblueversion 21:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Episode navigation

Again, please refrain from adding episode navigation boxes to articles, one can easily see the previous and following episode by looking at the infobox. The navigation boxes make the article look messy, plus, there was prior consensus against this and little input was received on WP:FG. They are not needed, so please don't add them. Qst 20:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

If they shouldn't be there, then maybe the boxes for all the other episodes might as well be deleted too. Immblueversion 20:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Griffin

Thank you for rewording the section I made look more encyclopedic, really appreciated. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Any time. It feels goods to be accepted now that I have mastered the art of discussing stuff. Immblueversion 20:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Family Guy characters

I'm going from active Family Guy users who frequently edit pages to discuss a situation that has arisen. Please see the discussion page to reply, thanks~!- Yours truly, S (talk) 19:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

What characters doo you think makes the recurring list? We're about to create the list! - Yours truly, [ S ] υ ρ є r ı o r reply! 23:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Definitely characters who have served as running gags, such as the Giant Chicken, the Evil Monkey, the Performance Artist, the Greased-Up Deaf Guy, etc. Immblueversion (talk) 23:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Family-guy-stewie-griffin1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Family-guy-stewie-griffin1.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Baby Not on Board

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Baby Not on Board, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Baby Not On Board. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi. In regard to the above, I noticed that you created both articles. I'm assuming that you created the second one because you thought it was the proper case level. However, the solution is far simpler: There is a "move" tab at the top of each page. That is what is used in such a situation. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I did not know that. Thank you. Immblueversion (talk) 00:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Clevelandshow.jpg

You are aware that this image lacks a fair use rationale for its use in both articles you have placed it in?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

  • I recall putting it in only one article, but I am aware. I just don't know what to do. Immblueversion (talk) 01:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Just say where the image is being used, who owns the copyright, whether or not it is a low resolution image, how the image is being used in an encyclopedic fashion, and whether or not the use of the image will detract from the copyright owner's copyright. Or, you can fill out the information at {{Non-free use rationale}} for each usage.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
      • If you're telling me to do it here and now, the image is in the articles "The Cleveland Show" and "Cleveland Brown" last I checked. I honestly don't know the copyright, but it serves the same purpose as other promotional images of the show that are used in this site. Immblueversion (talk) 11:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)