User talk:Imb0red123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have recently re-created the article Kenny sampaio, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Please do not recreate nonsense pages. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Sophie thomson. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Speedy deletion of Emily Burr's Diarhoea

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onorem♠Dil 12:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Watsonslip

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Watsonslip, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Watsonslip. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Watsonslip

An editor has nominated Watsonslip, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watsonslip and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. - Philippe | Talk 03:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


{

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This account is used by the entire Ward family. My 15 year old son, who I have previously allowed to use the family's Wikipedia account, has been posting false articles which I discovered and reviewed when my two daughters recently attempted to edit information on a Wikipedia page and discovered the account had been banned. I assume the false articles are the reason for the account being banned. I will punish my son accordingly for this behavior by no longer allowing him access to Wikipedia. In the meantime, I would appreciated if the rest of the family could continue to edit articles truthfully by having this ban lifted. Thank you."

Decline reason: "Reviewing this account's edit history, I found two useful edits, two sandbox edits... and the rest was vandalism as far as I could see. The history indicates that your son has used this account a great deal more than you have; you'd be better off creating a new one and not giving him the password. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

As a side note- Wikipedia doesn't allow group accounts, only individual ones- if separate members of your family want to edit Wikipedia, you're all welcome- but you should create separate user accounts for yourselves. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)