Talk:Icy Tower
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Contents |
[edit] Merged from Free Lunch Design
I merged from the Free Lunch Design article, which narrowly survived a deletion listing. --Tony SidawayTalk 23:13, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
I did some serious clarification, and some formatting. The floyd 15:10, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] como puedo hacer para jugar a Icy Tower
Just download and install it. It should not be too hard, it includes an installer. -- ReyBrujo 23:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 2005
it was released way earlier than 2005. I remember playing it 3-4 years ago!--Sonjaaa 22:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- You are right. The current date must have been believed to be a release date of the v1.3 (though it would still be incorrect). I will change it to the release date of the first version. :) Vinyanov 12:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Notability
I removed the notability tag, since this issue has already been discussed [1] in relation to this article with the decision being made to keep. --Zagrebo 15:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, but where in the article is notability asserted? (Even the keep reasons in the AfD seem to be "it's notable because it's notable"). Marasmusine 20:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
At the moment nowhere because the article is in dire need of citations (as the tag says) as well as major major tidying-up and rewriting since it's currently too full of big long lists and the like. There is plenty of stuff "out there" about it, though, thanks to its popularity. Give it time! By all means editors need prodded on this one but tagging it for deletion is not the same thing. --Zagrebo 21:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oki doki, I didn't tag it for deletion though :> It was a notability concern tag. I know... they're both grey boxes though... Marasmusine 22:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair enough. I actually did a spot of research to try and get some cites earlier and found some good stuff including a news story about it being converted to mobile phones (I think by a commercial company). I'll try and get them into the article soon. --Zagrebo 22:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Protection
This article should really use protection. I find it vadalised, or being tested on, after each visit. And unfortunately some reverts do not even recover all content that was removed by the vandals. Well, at least we could infer, from the quantity of reverted edits, that the game is certainly notable for many people. That was per above sections. :) So, pity that so late, but I think I will file the protection proposal. Don’t you think? viny.tell // 22:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
