User talk:Iani
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Iani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --OpenToppedBus - Talk 10:17, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Deletion
I'd say your best bet is to visit WP:VFD/Yesterday for a large sample of articles that are deemed unsuitable, and how the process goes. Many controversies are resolved there. Radiant_>|< 15:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip; Amazing how fast questions are answered here. No wonder Wikipedia is addictive to so many. ;). --Iani 15:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Second Life
Hi! It is good to see fellow Second Lifers in the Wikipedia :) If you have need for some more free fun ask me in game for a couple landmarks hehehe. Sarg 23:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gletscher
Just FYI, I have suggested on this page that the article is a dictionary definition that would be more appropriate for Wiktionary. It seems unlikely that the article could be expanded, since there is already a thorough Glacier article, but I wanted to give you a heads-up. --Russ Blau (talk) 20:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- Do you know how to make a link from Wikipedia to wictionary? Yes. [[wiktionary:gletscher|]] will look like this: gletscher. Don't leave out the | character or you'll see wiktionary:gletscher. --Russ Blau (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thanks. Did that, and checked now, it is in Wiktionary. Wiktionary (not wictionary ;-) ... My mistake too. Iani 21:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Twittervision
A tag has been placed on Twittervision requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

