Talk:Hurricane Inez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Replacement
According this page, the name Inez was replaced by Isabel. But I couldn't find the information about it. Please tell me the web site which describes it.--HERB 15:05, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Todo
Infobox picture is the wrong shape. Impact is nearly non-existent. Jdorje 05:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- (Sigh), I tried to give a little more impact, but, dude, there is nothing on this storm! I couldn't find anything! It's still next to nothing on the page. →Cyclone1→ 00:28, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Damn, that sucks. Hurricanehink 00:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge?
This article needs to be either remade or merged. The information box and picture needs to be fixed a bit, and the introduction, storm history, and impact sections are not written very well or detailed. If nothing can be done, I vote for a temporary merge. CapeVerdeWave 02:16, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Huge no on merge. This hurricane was retired. It can still be remade. I doubt many people even check up on this storm. If anyone wants to, they can just do what I've done before. Rewrite each section, section-by-section until it's good. The main problem with this storm is that there's not a lot of information on it. Here's a little info I found.
- A tornado spawned by Inez killed a 15 year old in the Bahamas
- This page gives Florida rainfall data
- Florida impact
- 3 killed and $5.5 million in damage
- Monthly weather review- 45 deaths in Florida keys, info on other places as well
- The Structure of a Small, Intense Hurricane- Inez (1966)
- Cuba effects
- Two Tornadoes in Florida
- I'm sure there's more, but I don't have time to look through all of Google. --Hurricanehink (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- I improved the introduction and storm history sections and added sources. I am going to remake the entire article, add more details and sources, improve the writing, and expand/improve the impact section and try to add a detailed preparations section. Does it already look better? I might change the introduction and storm history sections around a bit until I find the writing and deatails look best. Is that OK as well? CapeVerdeWave 04:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- The overall format is a lot better. Good luck remaking the article. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I found an interesting radar image I added. Does it look good, or is there a problem with it (e.g., copyrighted)? CapeVerdeWave 03:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nice pic. It's Public Domain, as it's part of NOAA (it's mentioned at the top). --Hurricanehink (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I found an interesting radar image I added. Does it look good, or is there a problem with it (e.g., copyrighted)? CapeVerdeWave 03:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- The overall format is a lot better. Good luck remaking the article. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- I improved the introduction and storm history sections and added sources. I am going to remake the entire article, add more details and sources, improve the writing, and expand/improve the impact section and try to add a detailed preparations section. Does it already look better? I might change the introduction and storm history sections around a bit until I find the writing and deatails look best. Is that OK as well? CapeVerdeWave 04:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Impact
Come, on. There has got to be some kind of impact info out there. if not than i don't know why this article still exists. Juliancolton 20:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- The hurricane was retired and was very deadly. There is info out there, and though it's lacking in info that's no reason to merge the article. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

