User talk:HowardDean

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. You may also want to check out Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful. In addition, you might want to add yourself to the new user log; if you made any edits before getting an account, you may wish to assign those to your username.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Finally, here are some open tasks:

[edit]

Here are some tasks you can do:

Other links for reference: Wikipedia:Wikiquette, image copyright tags, Wikipedia:Merge

Hope to see you around the Wiki! Remember to be Bold! with your edits, and if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

<>Who?¿? 7 July 2005 07:05 (UTC)

[edit] GOP and Dems

Dems were significantly more liberal than GOP on most issues since 1896. As for Asians there were no party differences. On racial segregation the GOP was more liberal down to 1940s, but that was not a front-burner issue at the time. Rjensen 02:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your username

Hi, there is some discussion going on regarding your choice of username. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:HowardDean. Thanks! — TheKMantalk 05:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Don't worry about this: this was just a query from an overly cautious editor. Your contribution history is excellent, so really, it's no big deal. – ClockworkSoul 05:54, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Far left Politicians

The issue with the Far Left and Far Right categories is mostly the lack of a clear, objective, definition - it's just too easy for them to be used as a vector to attack or smear. I'll change my delete vote if you can come up with a clear standard for both that people will agree too. Trapper 17:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Adding unverified claims to David Letterman

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to David Letterman. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Mike Beckham 09:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

It is unverified and original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Please do not re-add it or you may be blocked. - Mike Beckham 11:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rebecca Cummings

HowardDean, You participated in the first AfD discussion for the Rebecca Cummings article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Cummings. The decision was keep but it has been nominated for deletion a second time. I thought you may be interested in participating in the discussion that is going on at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rebecca_Cummings_%282nd_nomination%29. Thanks in advance. --HeartThrobs 01:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)