Talk:Honda Fit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Honda Fit article.
Article policies
This is not a forum for general discussion of Honda Fit.
Any such messages will be deleted. Please limit discussion to improvement of the article.
Cars Portal
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Archive
Archives


Contents

[edit] Honda Fit hybrid

Consider the source. Nihon Keizai Shimbun is Japan's version of the Wall Street Journal.

I have stated it as a rumour, but they are stating it as fact. Ng.j 23:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Looks like Honda changed direction and will go with something else. Ng.j 23:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jazz badge in North America?

I know that the car is/was being marketed as a "Fit" here in the States, but just a few days ago I spotted a Honda Fit with a "Jazz" badge. I'm located nowhere near the Mexican or Canadian borders, so I seriously doubt it's from out of the country--is Honda selling the Jazz here now? --76.26.198.20 03:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC) KeplerNiko

Might have been someone who retrofitted a Jazz badge on an American Fit, just for the heck of it. Still interesting, though. Mike Helms 10:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Addition of 5 speed automatic transmission

On the section where it lists the different transmissions offered for the 2nd generation Fit,there is also a 5-speed automatic transmission that's only offered with the all wheel drive Fit.

http://www.autobytel-japan.com/catalog/HO64.html

67.181.84.209 (talk) 17:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The picture is WAY too big!

Maybe it's just my browser, but the main picture in the article looks HUGE! 71.11.215.216 (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Not a hatchback?

It's rear windows is almost vertical (very 'nice'), so can it be considered a true hatchback? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.240.234.212 (talk • contribs)

True, but the angle of the rear window is not the only determining factor to classify a vehicle a hatchback. Roguegeek (talk) 10:03, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Second-gen edit feedback

An editor has decided to make, what I believe, is a major edit to the second-gen section. I oppose this and think an edit like this should be brought to the group of editors. I'm not of the opinion one editor should be making a large edit such as this without discussion and the blind reverting of the opposition leads me to believe an edit war is easily within reach. I figure I'd bring it here to see what everyone's thoughts are. So, thoughts? Roguegeek (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)