Talk:Holly McNarland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Canadian music
This article is part of the Canadian music WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

This article seems to be a copyright violation. I found the text of the article at [1] which claims to have been last modified on December 14, 2004, well before this article was posted. Additionally, the site claims the content is copyright 2000. If the contributor in fact owns the copyright, could they please speak up? Alternatively, if the text at that web site is in fact in the public domain (or licensed appropriately), could someone point this out to me? Otherwise, we'll have to mark this article as a copyright infringement. Thanks. --Yamla 18:48, 2005 Mar 3 (UTC)

The initial article was a copyright violation and has been deleted. It was replaced with a new one, basically just a stub. --Yamla 15:29, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] opinionated

this article seem a little opinionated to anyone else? and why no picture?Karaveks voice 20:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Opinionated and, just as bad, uncited. I removed the uncited information that smacked of original research. There's no picture because it isn't all that easy to find one that we have the legal right to use. --Yamla 20:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

wouldnt one from her official site be good, as long as it was labelled "from her oficial site"? oh and speaking of the official site, maybe we could copy ( or rework) some ofthe main page to fill out the article, as long as its cited, i cant relaly see a problem....Karaveks voice 20:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)