User talk:HenningThielemann

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, HenningThielemann, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:54, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Remark on categories

I renamed Category:Continuous wavelet to Category:Continuous wavelets, as I think plural is more acceptable for a category, and the same for Category:Orthogonal wavelet, to Category:Orthogonal wavelets.

By the way, any articles showing up in these two specific categories should not show up in Category:Wavelets anymore I think, as having an article both in Category:Orthogonal wavelets and Category:Wavelets is reduntant I think. If you agree, you may want to remove the less specific category. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:54, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Same for Category:Biorthogonal Wavelet --> Category:Biorthogonal wavelets. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks fr refinable function. You might be interested in following the conversations on the talk pages of Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics. linas 00:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Maths on Wikipedia

The edit summary of your last edit to Matrix function makes me wonder whether you have read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (mathematics), which suggests to use italics and all that for maths typesetting. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Quotation from that page: "Either form is acceptable [math or italics], but do not change one form to the other in other people's writing. They are likely to get annoyed since this seems to be a highly emotional issue. Changing to make an entire article consistent is acceptable." My article was consistently type set in math mode, because I follow the LaTeX philosophy of writing code with respect to intention (it's math) not with respect to appearence (I don't care whether math is presented italics or not). Admittedly, LaTeX itself breaks this philosophy especially within math type setting, but that's another issue. I see no reason why you changed my math typeset to italics. HenningThielemann 04:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)