Talk:Harold Howard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Harold Howard article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

This article is part of WikiProject Mixed martial arts, an attempt to better organise and unify articles relating to mixed martial arts concepts, events, and biographies. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

[edit] Molestationg Accusation

So someone keeps on posting a Randleman documentary, claiming that Howard molested him as a child. Maybe this is true, maybe this isn't. I don't know -- nor do I claim to. However, per guidelines ofWikipedia:Biographies of living persons:

Editors should remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Verifiability, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see Wikipedia:No original research). If the material is derogatory and unsourced or poorly sourced, the three-revert rule does not apply to its removal. Content may be re-inserted when it conforms to this policy.

If a reliable source can be quoted and cited for this statement, it can (and should) go back in. But only until citation can be added! Djma12 ^(talk) 23:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Added again by an IP rolled back & warned. --Nate1481( ^t/_c) 10:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] YouTube videos

Posted by a user here --Mista-X (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)