Talk:H.U.R.L.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm adding more info today. I know that it qualifies as original research, but as far as I can see, so does everything else in the article, and it has surprised me that it has stood unchallenged so far. I would also say that pretty much any article on an obscure video game is going to consist of almost entirely OR statements. (But it's not like there's anything to be gained by putting up false info.) Haplolology Talk/Contributions 08:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup
I've done a bit of a cleanup of this, added some cite tags where needed and removed the extremely biased and un-encyclopedic section on the AI. Unfortunately I'm not in the mood for citations and so forth, so that might wait until later 202.134.239.230 (talk) 12:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- I found a reference for the multiple names. The other two things are goin to be hard. The best I can do for the AI question is link to a game review; the other one is just something I happen to know from talking to the programmers. Soap Talk/Contributions 19:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

