Grotesque (chess)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.
Ottó Bláthy
The Chess Amateur, 1922
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Image:chess zver 26.png a8 b8 c8 d8 e8 f8 g8 h8 Image:chess zver 26.png
a7 b7 c7 d7 e7 f7 g7 h7
a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 f6 g6 h6
a5 b5 c5 pd d5 e5 f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 pd c4 pd d4 e4 f4 g4 h4
a3 bd b3 rd c3 pd d3 pd e3 f3 g3 h3
a2 qd b2 pd c2 pd d2 rd e2 pd f2 kl g2 h2 pl
a1 b1 nd c1 kd d1 bd e1 nd f1 g1 h1
Image:chess zhor 26.png
White to play and win.

In chess, a grotesque is a problem or endgame study which features a particularly unlikely initial position, especially one in which White fights with a very small force against a much larger black army. Grotesques are generally intended to be humorous.

A particularly extreme example by Ottó Bláthy is illustrated at the right. In the initial position Black has all sixteen pieces remaining and White has just a single pawn on its starting square, yet it is White who will deliver checkmate.

This position in Forsyth-Edwards Notation (FEN) is : 8/8/8/2p5/1pp5/brpp4/qpprpK1P/1nkbn3 w - - 0 1

The solution is:

1.Kxe1 Qa1 2.h3! Qa2 3.h4 Qa1 4.h5 Qa2 5.h6 Qa1 6.h7 Qa2 7.h8N! Qa1 8.Nf7 Qa2 9.Nd8 Qa1 10.Ne6 Qa2 11.Nxc5 Qa1 12.Ne4 Qa2 13.Nd6 Qa1 14.Nxc4 Qa2 15.Na5 Qa1 16.Nxb3#

The fact that the black queen must be on a1 rather than a2 when White plays Nxb3 explains why 2.h4 does not work. Similarly, if the white knight takes a more direct route to the b3 square with 8.Ng6 Qa2 9.Ne5 Qa1 10.Nxc4 Qa2 11.Na5, Black can lose a move with 11...c4! 12.Nxc4 Qa1 13.Na5 Qa2 and there is no mate. This kind of precise timing is quite a common feature in this type of problem. Grotesques may be grotesque, but they are not without their subtleties.

Tigran Gorgiev
Third Prize, Schach Echo, 1969
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Image:chess zver 26.png a8 b8 c8 d8 e8 f8 g8 h8 Image:chess zver 26.png
a7 b7 c7 d7 e7 f7 g7 h7
a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 nl f6 g6 h6
a5 b5 c5 d5 e5 ql f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 pd c4 pd d4 e4 f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 pd c3 d3 e3 f3 nl g3 h3
a2 bd b2 pd c2 qd d2 pd e2 f2 pd g2 h2
a1 nd b1 rd c1 kd d1 rd e1 bd f1 kl g1 h1
Image:chess zhor 26.png
White to play and draw.

The composer most closely associated with the grotesque is probably Tigran Gorgiev; one of his examples is shown to the left.

This position in Forsyth-Edwards Notation (FEN) is : 8/8/4N3/4Q3/1pp5/1p3N2/bpqp1p2/nrkrbK2 w - - 0 1

This time, White is to play and draw. This is achieved by sacrificing most of his already small force to compel Black to repeat moves: 1.Nf4 Qd3+ (otherwise 2.Ne2+ leads to mate) 2.Nxd3+ cxd3 3.Qc3+ bxc3 4.Ne5 Kc2 5.Nc4 Kc1 6.Ne5 and Black has nothing more than a draw by repetition. Note that only the squares c4 and e5 will do for the white knight; if, for example 4.Nd4 then 4...Nc2 allows Black to free himself (this is not possible with the knight on e5 because of Nxd3#); and if, for example, 5.Nc6 then Black can free himself with 5...Rbc1 or 5...Rdc1 (not possible with the knight on c4 because of Na3# and Ne3# respectively).

Similar play to that found in grotesques such as these may also be found in very long moremovers (problems with the stipulation "White to play and checkmate Black in no more than n moves", where n is very high, sometimes over 100, known as longmovers), of which Bláthy was also a notable composer

Paul Lamford
Chess America, March 1981
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Image:chess zver 26.png a8 b8 c8 d8 e8 f8 g8 h8 Image:chess zver 26.png
a7 b7 c7 d7 e7 f7 g7 h7
a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 f6 g6 h6
a5 b5 kd c5 d5 e5 f5 pd g5 h5
a4 pd b4 c4 pd d4 e4 pd f4 pl g4 pd h4
a3 pl b3 pd c3 pl d3 pd e3 pl f3 g3 pl h3 pd
a2 b2 pl c2 d2 pl e2 f2 g2 h2 pl
a1 ql b1 nl c1 kl d1 e1 f1 nl g1 rl h1 rl
Image:chess zhor 26.png
White to play and win.

To the right is a kind of problem quite closely related to these kinds of grotesques: this time it is White who has a clear material advantage, but it is difficult to make anything of it because of the locked pawn chain.

This position in Forsyth-Edwards Notation (FEN) is : 8/8/8/1k3p2/p1p1pPp1/PpPpP1Pp/1P1P3P/QNK2NRR w - - 0 1

At first glance it seems there is nothing to be done--on moves like Rg2, White cannot make progress unless Black captures--but White does have one plan: to play Qa2 at an appropriate moment in order to threaten Qxb3. Doing this immediately does not work (Black simply promotes on a1 and it is Black who wins by ... Qa2-b3-c2 mate), but there is a way:

1.Kd1 Kb6 2.Ke1 Kb5 3.Rg2 Kb6 4.Re2 Kb5 5.Kf2 Kb6 6.Re1 Kb5 7.Rg1 Kb6 8.Rg2 Kb5 9.Rc1 Kb6 10.Ke1 Kb5 11.Re2 Kb6 12.Kd1 Kb5 13.Re1 Kb6 14.Rc2 Kb5 15.Kc1 Kb6 16.Qa2!! bxa2 17.b4! a1Q 18.Rb2 Kb5 19.Rd1 Ka6 20.b5+ Kb6 21.Re1 Ka7 22.b6+ Kb7 23.Rd1 and Black must either give up his queen or allow the b pawn to promote.

Just as it is important in the grotesque, humour is the predominant element in the joke chess problem.

[edit] References

  • Tigran Gorgiev, "Study Economy and 'Grotesque' Positions", in EG No. 25 (July 1971)
  • David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld, "Grotesque" in The Oxford Companion to Chess (Oxford University Press, 1996)
Languages