Talk:Good Neighbor policy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Central America, which collaborates on articles related to Central America. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
So what exactly was the Good Neighbor Policy? The article doesn't say. 68.41.174.194 05:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] agree
article doesn't even say what the policy was
[edit] Work on this. it is pathetic
Considering the variety of articles relating to FDR, all extremly extensive, this is the only one dedicated to his sucessful foreign policy, and it is a lazy one paragraph stub. wikipedia you can do better. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.248.97.216 (talk) 23:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
If you think that the article is pathetic, change it yourself. Be bold! That's the philosophy of Wikipedia, if you think something's inaccurate or missing, edit it in yourself! Phuzion 22:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Background
The article about Background is absolute trash and should be removed. It looks like some latin-american marxist from the 70s came out of his retirement to write this Background.
[edit] Vandalism
I have only gone through some parts of this article, and several parts of it are apparently vandalized with someone with a poor usage of the English language. I recommend for this article to become locked to users without accounts and very recent accounts.MarshalN20 (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Horrible
This article is horrible. Who wrote this thing? Why is "Anti-American" a related link? Someone needs to fix this article. I think it was written by some Anti-American person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.72.128 (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
