User talk:Godemperorofdune
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome!
|
[edit] May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to St Aloysius' College (Malta) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 01:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution to Oxalomalate_lyase, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Diff Xymmax (talk) 02:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to High Raise (Langdale). If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edison (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Northeast Dairy Compact.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edison (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have looked over your contribution history. You have done several reversions of the vandalism of others, but you have also vandalized a great many articlesby the insertion of nonsense. This decreases the usefulness of Wikipedia and requires time to be spent by others which might otherwise contribute to the betterment of articles. It is also not funny. Please use your skills to improve articles rather than inserting nonsense into articles. Thanks. Edison (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
You blanked one article you thought should be deleted. If you are looking for something to do, try reading the instructions at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for nominating an article for speedy deletion. There is also Wikipedia:Proposed deletion and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Edison (talk) 18:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
PeterSymonds | talk 19:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Template:If you block me then how am I supposed to continue to torment Edison for undoing all my edit?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Godemperorofdune (talk • contribs)
- Note- I only undid your edits which were the insertion of your pet nonsense phrase into a number of articles. I left untouched your several reversions of the vandalism of others. Edison (talk) 22:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Blortash is back, suckazGodemperorofdune (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:Edison, you will be blocked from editing. Onorem♠Dil 02:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Actually it is funny (in the "odd" sense) that a variety of articles could be "blortashed" and remain thus for longer than a minute or two. Irene Spry was blortashed for 3 1/2 days, with what was obvious vandalism. Wikipedia has lots of pages that no one seems to be watching, which argues against having so many pages about things of such slight notability. Edison (talk) 03:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

